THE MODEL OF GEORGIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND POST CRISES GLOBAL ECONOMY

Author:

KHADURI NODAR1

Affiliation:

1. Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University

Abstract

Despite the fact that Georgia has already been an independent country for 25 years and inculcates the principles of market economy, the issue of choosing the model of country’s economic development has not been resolved up to the present time. Georgia frequently chooses radical models not only at the theoretical level, but also at the political one and has ambitions of merging them by unique prescription. Unfortunately, frequently there are attempts to borrow ideologically inappropriate models without comprehending their essence that causes problems for maintaining achieved successes. In order to choose a correct model, it is imperative to analyse at least at the theoretical level all those threats and possible successes that can be caused by choosing this or that model and its implementation. It is important that the society achieve consensus on what political philosophy the Georgian state system should be based on, the organic or mechanical theories of state. According to the first one the state is a natural organism, each individual is a part of this organism, and the state itself is a heart of this organism. According to this ideology; the individual is important as a part of society and his/her wellbeing should be considered in the context of the well-being of society. As regards the mechanical theory, it is based on the notion that the state is not an organic part of society and humans devised it to achieve their own goals. The economic essence of the noted theories is clearly reflected in Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes’s theoretical legacy. Smith was convinced that, if there are free markets and individuals act by their own interests, the whole economy works well. Smith claimed, that in the conditions of market economy the useful action of individuals’ own interests by the principle of “invisible hand” brings about maximization of the general well-being of society. According to Keynes, Smith’s “invisible hand” showed an utter irrelevance to the real developments that became a reason for formulating a new macroeconomic theory. Today our aim is to find that theoretical golden mean, which in case of its implementation, will enable Georgian economic model to be maximally effective and fair. individual is important as a part of society and his/her wellbeing should be considered in the context of the well-being of society. As regards the mechanical theory, it is based on the notion that the state is not an organic part of society and humans devised it to achieve their own goals. The economic essence of the noted theories is clearly reflected in Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes’s theoretical legacy. Smith was convinced that, if there are free markets and individuals act by their own interests, the whole economy works well. Smith claimed, that in the conditions of market economy the useful action of individuals’ own interests by the principle of “invisible hand” brings about maximization of the general well-being of society. According to Keynes, Smith’s “invisible hand” showed an utter irrelevance to the real developments that became a reason for formulating a new macroeconomic theory. Today our aim is to find that theoretical golden mean, which in case of its implementation, will enable Georgian economic model to be maximally effective and fair.

Publisher

European University's Institute for the Research of Economic and Social Problems of Globalization

Reference19 articles.

1. საქართველოს სოციალურ-ეკონომიკური განვითარების სტრატეგია - საქართველო 2020. www.mof.ge.

2. როუზენი ჰ.ს., საჯარო ფინანსები, ტ.-1, თბილისი, 2006.

3. Blanchard Olivier (ed), Rajan Raghuram, Rogoff Kenneth, and Lawrence H Summers, Progress and Confusion (2016). The State of Macroeconomic Policy. The IMF, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.

4. Blanchard Olivier (ed.), Romer David, Spence Michael, and StiglitzJozeph. In the Wake of the Crisis. Leading Economists Reassess Economic Policy. The IMF, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England 2013;

5. Furman, Jason,. The Right Question About Inequality and Growth, 2018;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3