CULTURE AS A FACTOR OF KNOWLEDGE ECONOMICS WITH PARADIGMATIC CHANGES IN SYSTEMIC INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT

Author:

BEDIANASHVILI GIVI1

Affiliation:

1. European University

Abstract

In modern conditions it is important to develop a systemic and institutional concept of culture as a form of knowledge economy. In order to present a systemic concept of knowledge and culture in the formation of knowledge economy, I think the new meaning of paradigmatic and conceptual aspects of economic science is of particular importance. In addition, the systematic representation of the cognition process is particularly important. As shown by the practice of recent years, the main problems in the form of knowledge technology are solved, which will facilitate the improvement of the “cognitive” function of economic science and enhance its practical benefits. The modern stage of globalization is characterized by a number of specific peculiarities of post-dosystem development, which, in our view, is important to the development of knowledge-based economy (knowledge economy). It is noteworthy that globalization stems from adding global dimensional dimensions to the knowledge economy, such as resource-technological, informative, communicative and institutional structures. In addition, we think it is necessary to understand the knowledge of the knowledge economy. This makes it possible to develop culture with knowledge as a factor of forming a knowledge economy. According to the Postindustural Theory, the main resource of the post-denser economy is information and knowledge, the main type of manufacturing activity is the high level of automation of the production, the science of technologies used primarily from the main technologies, and various services are the most common types of economic activity. In industrial society, the field of agriculture, industry - Industry, Postindustry - determinants are already theoretical knowledge with universities, as a place of active and generating knowledge.

Publisher

European University's Institute for the Research of Economic and Social Problems of Globalization

Reference192 articles.

1. 1. ბარათაშვილი, ე., ზარანდია, ჯ., მარიდაშვილი, მ., ჩეჩელაშვილი, მ., მახარაშვილი, ი., ღამბაშიძე, თ. (2016). შედარებითი მენეჯმენტი და კლასტერიზაცია. თბილისი.

2. 2. ბედიანაშვილი, გ. (2014). კულტურა როგორც ინსტიტუტი ქვეყნის სოციალურ-ეკონომიკური განვითარების და საერთაშორისო ბიზნესის კონტექსტში. ჟურნალი „ეკონომისტი“, ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი, პაატა გუგუშვილის

3. ეკონომიკის ინსტიტუტი, №6, თბილისი.

4. 3. ბედიანაშვილი, გ. (2017). ცოდნის ეკონომიკის ფორმირება და ინოვაციური სამეწარმეო პოლიტიკა: ინსტიტუციური ასპექტი. ჟურნალი: „გლობალიზაცია და ბიზნესი“, №3б , გვ.10-16.

5. 4. ბედიანაშვილი, გ. (2018). კროს-კულტურული ურთიერთობები საერთაშორისო ბიზნესში. თბილისი.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3