Author:
MUKHERJEE ANIRBAN,SINGH PREMLATA,RAY MRINMOY,SATYAPRIYA SATYAPRIYA,BURMAN RAJARSHI ROY
Abstract
There is a growing optimism that the farmers' organizations can act as a potential driving force for enhancing farmers' income. India has witnessed a positive growth of producer organizations in terms of types of organization, numbers and members. The Producer Company is a special case of producer organization that is registered under Section IXA of the Companies Act, 1956. A need was felt at that time to have an independent farmers’ organization which enables incorporation of producers into such an institution like the companies which will be controlled by them, having welfare and business outlook at a time while not compromising the sustainability issues. That creates the milieu for the genesis of Farmers’ Producer Company (FPC) in India. The FPCs are fundamentally farmer-owned and farmer-governed micro-enterprises which can be considered as hybrids between cooperative societies and private companies. The way of participation, membership and organization is similar to that of a cooperative, while the incorporation into corporate law allows greater flexibility and professionalism in their business actions. Till date 1048 FPCs are registered in India. In this article attempt has been made to review the issues of FPC, current status and future prospects. Forecasting the growth of FPC has been done up to the year 2020 utilizing Grey Model. Emphasis has been given to critically analyse the status, prospects and potentials with future outlook of 2020 concluding with strategies and policy needs.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference64 articles.
1. Alagh K Y. 2007. On Producer Companies. PRADHAN’S Workshop on Producer Companies.
2. Altenberg T and Von Drachenfels C. 2006. The new minimalist approach to private sector development: A critical assessment. Development Policy Review 24 (4): 387–411.
3. ASA. 2009. Manual for producer companies-Volume-I and II. Action for Social Advancement (ASA). Prepared for district poverty initiatives programme (DPIP), Madhya Pradesh.
4. Bebbington A. 1999. Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development 27 (12): 2021–44.
5. Bhattacharjee S. 2010. Experience of producer organisations: A case study of five producer companies. Financing Agriculture 42 (7): 12–21.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献