Author:
JYOTI BIKRAM,MANI INDRA,KUMAR ADARSH,KHURA TAPAN K
Abstract
Application of chemicals application of chemical is an essential component of agriculture production system. Excessive use of these chemicals has led to search for a suitable chemical application method. Electrostatic spraying can be a viable option to eradicate the existing problem in chemical application. Electrical properties of spray liquid play an important role to impart charge to the spray droplet and it subsequent transportation to the intended target. Therefore it is necessary to characterize the spray liquid in terms of electrical properties for selected chemicals and their concentrations for electrostatic spraying. Hence, the present study was conducted to analyze the spray liquids in terms of their electrical properties using different chemicals. The implications of each electrical property with respect to spray chargeability, deposition on to the target, biological efficacy and suitability for electrostatic charging were established. The electrical conductivity varied from 0.50-0.526, 531-565 and 497-546 μs/cm for distilled, ground and tap water, respectively at all selected levels of concentration and chemicals. For ground water and tap water, both the electrical conductivity was significantly higher than that of distilled water. Dielectric constant varied from 80.18–80.28, 80.26–80.42 and 80.597–80.66 for distilled, ground and tap water, respectively at all selected levels of concentration and chemicals. For ground water and tap water, the dielectric constant was higher than that of distilled water.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference11 articles.
1. Bailey A G. 1988. Electrostatic Spraying of Liquids. Research Studies Press Ltd, Taunton, Great Britain.
2. Hislop E C, Western N M, Cooke B K and Butler R. 1987. Experimental air-assisted spraying of young cereal plants under controlled conditions. Crop Protection 12: 193–200.
3. Kang T G, Lee D H, Lee C S, Kim S H, Lee G I and Choi W K. No S Y. 2004. Spray and depositional characteristics of electrostatic nozzles for orchard sprayers. American Society of Agricultural Engineering (ASAE). Paper No : 041005.
4. Maski D and Durairaj D. 2010. Effects of charging voltage, application speed, target height, and orientation upon charged spray deposition on leaf abaxial and adaxial surfaces. Crop Protection 29: 134–41.
5. Allen J G, Austin D J, Butt D J, Swathi A A J and Warman T M. 1983. Experience with a handheld ULV charged drop sprayer on fruit. Proceedings of 10th International Congress of Plant Protection.Brighton, UK 501(2): 20–5.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献