Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2016 at College of Post Graduate Studies (CAU-Imphal), Umiam, Meghalaya to study the effect of population proportions of component crops on performance of maize (Zea mays L)+ soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] intercropping. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications comprised eight treatments (sole maize, sole soybean and six treatments on maize+soybean intercropping with different population proportion of component crops. Treatment 2:2 paired maize+soybean recorded maximum maize equivalent yield (3.91 t/ha) and land equivalent ratio (1.23) which were at par with intercropping treatments 1:1 Additive, 1:1 Replacement, 2:1 Replacement and 2:1 Additive but significantly higher over the sole maize and 2:1 Paired intercropped treatments. However, maximum net return (rupees 23643/ha)and B: C (1.68) ratio were recorded from 1:1 R maize+soybean which were at par with 2:1 Replacement and 2:2 Paired but significantly higher over sole maize and other intercropping treatments. Introduction of soybean as an intercrop in maize left relatively higher amount of soil available N, P, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and dehydrogenase activity (DHA) in soil after crop harvest as compared to sole maize.Significantly higher soil available N was recorded from the treatment 1:1 Replacement while significantly higher soil available P, SMBC and DHA were recorded from the treatment 2:2 Paired over sole maize, respectively.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference12 articles.
1. Addo-Quaye A A, Darkwa A A and Ocloo G K. 2011. Yield and productivity of component crops in a maize-soybean intercropping system as affected by time of planting and spatial arrangement. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 6(9): 50–7.
2. Anonymous. 2012. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.
3. Dolijanovic Z, Oljaca S, Kovacevic D, Simic M, Momirovic N and Jovanovic Z. 2013. Dependence of the productivity of maize and soybean intercropping systems on hybrid type and plant arrangement pattern. Genetika 45(1): 135–44.
4. Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis, p 485. Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.
5. Kheroar S and Patra B C. 2014. Productivity of maize-legume intercropping systems under rainfed situation. African Journal of Agricultural Research 9(20): 1610–7.