Author:
SINGH A K,KUMAR MUKESH,MITRA S
Abstract
The study examines carbon and energy footprints of jute, kenaf, sunnhemp and flax fibre production systems. Energy productivity was lowest in flax fibre production as compared to other fibre crops. Flax fibre production consumed more chemical fertilizer, diesels, pesticides and seed energy in comparison to other fibre crops. The carbon footprints of the all fibres crops did not differ significantly and were in the order of 566, 520, 445 and 423 kg CO2-eq/tonne of fibre for jute, flax, kenaf and sunnhemp, respectively. The carbon based sustainability index for jute (2.27) and kenaf (2.07) were highest due to better carbon use efficiency. Sustainability index of flax was negative (-0.67) due to higher carbon emission. Fertilization and fibre processing contributed most to GHG emissions. Overall, the carbon footprint of bast fibres was 20–50% lower than that of synthetic/artificial fibres.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference39 articles.
1. Acaroglu M and Aksoy A S. 2005. The cultivation and energy balance of Miscanthus giganteus production in Turkey. Biomass Bioenergy 29: 42–8.
2. Andrea M C S, Tieppo R C, Gimenez L M, Povh F P, Katsmen T J and Romanelli T C. 2014. Energy demand in agricultural biomass production in Parana State, Brazil. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal (Special issue):42–51.
3. Barth Martha and Michael Carus. 2015. Carbon Footprint and Sustainability of Different Natural Fibres for Biocomposites and Insulation Material. Nova-Institute, GmbH, Germany.
4. Banik A, Sen M and Sen S P. 1993. Methane emission from jute-retting tanks. Ecological Engineering 2:73–9.
5. Bhattacharjee A K, Sen H S, Sarkar S, Roy Anirban and Nayak P. 2007. Improved Production Technology for Mesta. Bulletin No: 07/2007, ICAR-CRIJAF, Barrackpore, India.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献