Author:
DHANSU POOJA,NANDWAL A S,KUMAR SURENDER,CHAND MEHAR,RANI BABITA,KULSHRESHTHA NEERAJ
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during spring season of 2014–15 and 2015–16 at CCS HAU, RRS, Karnal to evaluate the response of four sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) varieties differing in their maturity i.e. CoS 767 (Mid late), CoH128 (Mid late), CoJ 64 (Early) and Co 0238 (Early) to deficit irrigation. The experiment was conducted in split plot design with three replications. Based on available soil moisture (ASM), three treatments i.e. irrigation at 50% ASM (control), 40% ASM (mild stress) and 30% ASM (severe stress) were imposed in main plot and sugarcane varieties in sub-plot. Under deficit irrigation, leaf area, leaf area index (LAI), crop grown rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR), significantly, reduced at 30–60 and 60–90 DAP in all the varieties and the varieties Co 0238 and CoS 767 showed least reduction. The yield parameters, viz. number of millable canes, cane length, internodal length and single cane weight reduced significantly under water limited conditions and proved to be the most sensitive yield components responsible for decrease in cane and sugar yield. Cane yield and sugar yield reduced by 36.18% and 40.47%, and 27.5% and 31.09% at 30% and 40% ASM level, respectively. Co 0238 produced highest average cane yield and sugar yield (83.05 and 10.17 t/ha) followed by CoS 767 (68.23 and 8.28 t/ ha). Moreover, after stress revival Co 0238 and CoS 767 were able to recover faster which qualified these varieties to face short periods of drought without major losses in the initial phase of development.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference18 articles.
1. Ferreira T H S, Tsunada M S, Bassi D, Araújo P, Mattiello L, Guidelli G V, Righetto G L, Gonçalves V R, Lakshmanan P and Menossi M. 2017. Sugarcane water stress tolerance mechanisms and its implications on developing biotechnology solutions. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1077.
2. Farooq U, Mehmood S, Afghan S, Shahzad A and Asad M. 2015. Comparative study on agro-physiology of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) genotypes at different irrigation co-efficient values. Pakistan Journal of Botany 47: 527–32.
3. Gomathi R, Vasantha S, Hemaprabha G, Alarmelu S and Shanthi R M. 2011. Evaluation of elite sugarcane clones for drought tolerance. Journal of Sugarcane Research 1: 55–62.
4. Hemaprabha G, Nagarajan R and Alarmelu S. 2004. Response of sugarcane genotypes to water deficit stress. Sugar Tech 6(3): 165–68.
5. Hemaprabha G, Swapna S, Lavanya D L, Sajitha B and Venkataramana S. 2013. Evaluation of drought tolerance potential of elite genotypes and progenies of sugarcane (Saccharum sp. hybrids). Sugar Tech 15(1): 9–16.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献