Author:
DHAYAL DIANA,LAL KHAJANCHI,SINDHU VINAY KUMAR,KHANNA MANOJ,SUDHISHRI SUSAMA,SINGH MAN,BHATTACHARYYA R,ROSIN K G,CHAKRABORTY D
Abstract
An experiment was conducted at the research farm of ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhiduring 2019–20 and 2020–21 to study the productivity and economic viability of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek)–maize (Zea mays L.) fertigated with 0, 60, 80, 100% recommended dosesof NPK and irrigated at 0.6 and 0.8 crop evapotranspiration (ETc) through subsurface (SSDI) and surface drip irrigation (SDI). The results were compared with the conventional practice of surface irrigation and soil application of 100% recommended doses of NPK. Grain yields of wheat, mungbean, maize and system wheat equivalent yield (SWEY) improved by 22.9, 7.2, 21.9 and 19.4%, respectively with increase in NPK fertigation doses from 60 to 100% and by 15.6, 9.2, 4.9 and 9.7% with the increase in irrigation frequency from 0.6 to 0.8 ETc. However, SDI and SSDI had equal system productivity (12.48 and 12.85 Mg/ha). The SWEY at 0.8ETc fertigated either with NPK80 or NPK100was statistically at par (14.2–15.9 Mg/ha) with the conventional practice (14.3–15.2 Mg/ha). The cash inflow, netincome and benefit cost ratio (BCR) of the cropping system also increased successively with increase in fertigationdoses and irrigation frequency. The net income and BCR followed the order maize>wheat>mungbean. The net income under SSDI at 0.8 ETc with NPK80 or NPK100 in wheat, mungbean, maize and system was 11–13, 88–105, 1-9 and 8–14% higher than the conventional practice. At 0.8 ETc and NPK100, BCR in SSDI (1.86) was higher than in SDI(1.71) and conventional system (1.67).
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference16 articles.
1. Brar A S, Buttar G S and Vashist K K. 2019. Enhancing crop and water productivity of spring maize (Zea mays) through drip fertigation. Indian Journal of Agronomy 64(1): 87–92.
2. Brar A S, Kaur K, Sindhu V K, Tsolakis N and Srai J S. 2022. Sustainable water use through multiple cropping systems and precision irrigation. Journal of Cleaner Production 333: 130117. doi: 10.1016/Jjclepro.130117
3. Chen R, Cheng W, Liao J, Fan H, zheng z and Ma F. 2015. Lateral spacing in drip irrigated wheat: the effects on soil moisture, yield, and water use efficiency. Field Crops Research 179: 52–62.
4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). AQUASTAT Database. 2012. http://www.fao.org/nr/aquastat Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edn, 680 pp. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
5. Kishore P, Chand S and Srivastava S K. 2022. Potential area of micro-irrigation and its outreach across Indian states. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 92(9): 1056–60.