Author:
ROY P,KADAM M M,BHAISARE D B,ROKADE J J,BHANJA S K
Abstract
Two experiments were carried out with an objective to test the comparative performance of laying hens reared in conventional California cages vs furnished California cages with regards to production performance, egg quality parameters and immune status. Experiments were conducted at Poultry Research and Training Centre, Department of Poultry Science, Nagpur Veterinary College during 2019-21. Commercial White Leghorn (BV300) hens (n =72) in each experiment were assigned into two treatments with six replicates in conventional and furnished California cages, and reared for a 20 week period. The furnished cages (FC) are provided with perches, nesting area and scratch pad to meet the natural behaviour of the birds. There were two different treatments viz. 548 cm2/b×6 birds and 645cm2/b×6 birds to see the effect of different stocking density in cages. The performance of the laying hens reared in furnished cages were recorded and compared with findings of birds reared in conventional California cages (CC). The results showed that body weight, weight gain, hen day egg production percentages, feed : egg ratio, egg weight and proportion of broken eggs and dirty eggs were not significantly affected by cage types. However, Haugh unit and albumen height of the eggs from furnished cages hens were significantly higher than those from the conventional California cage hens. While H/L ratio and corticosterone values were significantly lowest in furnished cage system birds. It can be concluded from study that the layer birds can be reared in stress free condition in furnished cage system.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference21 articles.
1. Abrahamsson P and Tauson R. 1997. Effects of group size on performance, health and birds us of facilities in furnished cages for laying hens. Acta Agric Scand - A: Animal Science 47: 254–60.
2. Appleby M C, Walker A W, Nicol C J, Lindberg, A C, Freire R, Hughes B O and Elson. 2002. Development of furnished cages for laying hens. British Poultry Science 43: 489–500.
3. Duncan N D. 1995. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42.
4. Feng P G, Guo Y L, Yang H M, Ban Z B, Liang H and Zhang F Y. 2018. Research progress on the effect of stocking density on the health and production of livestock and poultry. Animal Science Veterinary Medicine 7: 34–38.
5. Gonzales E, Kondo N, Saldanha E S P B, Loddy M M, Careghi C and Decuypere E. 2003. Performance and physiological parameters of broiler chickens subjected to fasting on the neonatal period. Poultry Science 82: 1250–56.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献