Author:
TAMTA AKANKSHA,KUMAR RAKESH,RAM HARDEV,MEENA R K,KUMAR UTTAM,YADAV M R,SUBRAHMANYA D J,PANDEY ADRASH KUMAR
Abstract
Cereal–legume mixture may be a viable option to improve forage yield and quality. Furthermore, nitrogen requirement may also varying according to proportion of legume component. Therefore, the present study was carried out to evaluate the effect of different intercropping ratios and nitrogen levels on productivity and nutritional quality of fodder maize (Zea mays L.) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). The experiment was laid out in split plot arrangement with three intercropping row ratios of maize: cowpea (1:1, 2:1 and 1:2, respectively) in main plot and five nitrogen levels (0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 kg N/ha) in sub plot. Highest total green fodder, protein and ash yield in 2:1 ratio whereas maximum ether yield was reported in 1:2 intercropping ratio of maize and cowpea. However, the maximum crude protein, ether extract, ash content and lowest NDF, ADF and ADL of maize and cowpea, respectively were obtained under 1:2 intercropping ratio of maize and cowpea. Among N levels, highest total green fodder, crude protein, ether and ash yield and as well as their content in green forage of maize and cowpea were recorded with the use of 120 kg N/ha. However, cowpea responded significantly upto 60 kg N/ha only. The lowest NDF, ADF and ADL of maize and cowpea were found when these crops fertilized with 120 Kg N/ha. A significant interaction between intercropping ratios and N levels was reported in terms of yield. Thus, it can be concluded that nitrogen rates 90, 120 and 60 kg/ha found suitable to achieve maximum fodder yield in 1:1, 2:1 and 1:2 (maize: cowpea) ratios, respectively.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference18 articles.
1. AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, USA. Ayub M, Nadeem M A, Sharar M S and Mahmood N. 2002.
2. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) fodder to different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 1: 352–54.
3. Getachew B, Ketema B and Sharma J J. 2013. System productivity of forage legumes intercropped with maize and performance of the component crops in Kombolcha, eastern Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences 7: 99–108.
4. Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Willey and Sons, Singapore. 680 p.
5. Khan M A, Kakar S, Marwat K B and Khan I A. 2013. Differential response of Zea mays L. in relation to weed control and different macronutrient combinations. Sains Malaysiana 42(10): 1395–1401.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献