Author:
BABU RUDRA NARAYAN,KAUR DALJEET,UNIYAL SANDEEP,KAUR PAVITER,SINGH YASHPAL,KAUR PARAMJIT,MALIK D S
Abstract
The objective of the study was to compare the effects of alternative litter treatments on litter quality, growth, carcass traits and welfare of broiler chicks. Day old, commercial broiler chicks (180) having similar body weight range were randomly allocated to two different types of litter treatments, viz. treated litter at the rate of 120°C (T1) and litter treated with sodium bisulfate 25 g/sq. ft. (T2) along with the control group without any litter treatment (T0). Birds of all the treated groups performed better in terms of growth, feed intake and FCR, etc. Cake formation was frequent, highest in T0 followed by T1 and T2 groups which in turn affected the frequency of undesirably poor sanitary outlook of the birds. Significantly lower EPG (E. coli count per gram) count while a numerically lower microbial load of the faecal samples was noted in the T2 than T1 and control. This implied the change in the pH and acidification of litter materials prevented the growth of coccidia and microbial load in the litter, thus making the litter more suitable for bird welfare. It was concluded that chemical litter amendments had a beneficial effect on overall growth performance, carcass characteristics, health and welfare of broiler chicks.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference17 articles.
1. AOAC International. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Pp 2004. Analytical chemists. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
2. Bhatia B B, Pathak K M L and Juyal P D. 2010. Textbook of Veterinary Parasitology. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
3. California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement. 2010. Commodity specific food safety guidelines for the production and harvest of lettuce and leafy greens. California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement, Sacramento, CA. Accessed March 2011.
4. Duncan D B. 1995. Multiple range and multiple “F” tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42.
5. Eichner G, Vieira S L, Torres C A, Coneglian J L B, Freitas D M and Oyarzabal O A. 2007. Litter moisture and footpad dermatitis as affected by diets formulated on an all-vegetable basis or having the inclusion of poultry by-product. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16(3): 344–50.