Author:
KHAN M H,NATH K C,NASKAR S,DEKA B C,KUMAR SURESH
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to characterize the ultrastructural changes in boar spermatozoa at different stages during freezing (fresh undiluted semen, after holding at 24oC, after cooling to 5oC and after equilibration at 5oC) and after thawing using transmission electon microscopy (TEM). The study was also aimed to compare the sperm characteristics observed through conventional staining procedure with that of electron microscopy. A total of 72 ejaculates were collected from 6 Hampshire boars. Pooled semen was extended in BTSLEYG (Beltsvelli thawing solution lactose egg yok glycerol) extender and frozen in 0.5 ml French straws with conventional vapor freezing technique. Results of routine semen evaluation using conventional staining procedures seemed to be excellent. Microscopically assessed post-thaw percentage of progressively motile spermatozoa, live sperm count, spermatozoa with intact acrosome and hypo-osmotic reacted spermatozoa after thawing were 51.38±0.87, 56.83±0.74, 56.83±0.74 and 43.79±0.83, respectively. TEM examination of frozen–thawed semen revealed major changes in the morphology of spermatozoa localized predominantly within the acrosome and post acrosomal region of a head. Acrosomal and membrane integrity as observed through conventional statining and TEM was found to be 59.83±0.74 vs 37.88±8.85 and 43.79±0.83 vs 31.42±6.58%, respectively. It may be concluded that freezing and thawing of boar semen resulted into maximum sperm damage and electron microscopy revealed major changes in acrosome and plasma membrane which could not be seen with conventional staining procedure.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference30 articles.
1. Akiko O, Hiroaki I, Masaru K, Keiji T, Yasuhiro Y and Tadashi S. 2001. Cryopreservation induced acrosomal vesiculation in live spermatozoa from cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fasicularis). Human Reproduction 16 (10): 2139–47.
2. Bailey J L, Bilodeau J F and Cormier N. 2003. Semen cryopreservation in domestic animals: a damaging and capacitating phenomenon. Journal of Andrology 21: 1–7.
3. Boonkusol D, Saikhun K and Ratanaphumma P. 2010. Effect of extender and storage time on motility and ultrastructure of cooled-preserved boar spermatozoa. Kasetsart Journal of Natural Science 44: 582–89.
4. Bwanga C O, Braganca de M M, Einasson S and Rodriguez- Martinez H. 1990. Cryopreservation of boar semen in mini and maxi straws. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
5. Courtens J L and Paquignon M. 1985. Ultrastructure of fresh, frozen and frozen-thawed spermatozoa of the boar Proceedings of First International Conference on Deep Freezing Boar Semen. pp. 61–87. 25–27 August, Uppasala, Sweden.