Author:
ALAM SAFEER,RATHER MUBASHIR ALI,NABI NUSRAT,KAUR GURJEET,SHANAZ S,AHMAD NAZIR,AHMAD TAVSIEF,AHMAD MIR SHABIR,HAMADANI AMBREEN
Abstract
A study on the socio-economic, phenotypic, and technical features of Purgi goats in Kargil was undertaken. A total of 215 Purgi goat breeders from 8 villages were interviewed and 215 kids born between 2016 and 2018 were studied. The study revealed that Purgi goat farming under the study area is mainly practiced by poor farmers having an education level of middle to matric standard and belonging to the middle age group and scheduled tribe (Muslims) community. The average annual income (Lakhs) from goat farming, livestock rearing, agriculture, other sources and overall were 0.20±0.00, 0.32±0.02, 0.59±0.01, 0.59±0.01 and 1.40±0.02, respectively. Animals in small flocks are maintained semi-intensively. The predominant coat colour was black. The overall body weight (kg) was 1.08±0.04, 3.60±0.02, 5.83±0.03, 8.70±0.04, 10.58±0.06 and 13.46±0.14 at birth, weaning, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months. The least-squares means (cm) for body measurements, viz. height at withers (BH), body length (BL), heart girth (HG), and paunch girth (PG) at birth to yearling age were 58.87±0.03, 76.45±0.03, 71.21±0.05 and 74.22±0.12 cm, respectively. The age at first estrus, weight at first estrus, age at first service (AFS), weight at first service (WFS), age at first lambing (AFL), gestation period (GP), and inter kidding interval (KI) were 310.39±3.82 days, 74.22±0.12 (kg), 332.56±3.00 (days), 12.71±0.05 (kg), 513.06±2.36 (days), 149.93±0.11 (days) and 288.16±2.98 (days), respectively. It can be concluded that the Purgi goat is a unique, dwarf, and very important genetic resource of the country and it should be characterized and conserved for further improvements.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference47 articles.
1. Adesehinwa A O K and Okunlola J O. 2000. Socio-economic characteristics constraints to ruminant production in Ondo and Ekiti states. Moor Journal of Agricultural Research 1: 93–97.
2. Adesehinwa A O K, Okunola J O and Adewumi M K. 2004. Socio-economic characteristics of ruminant livestock farmers and their production constraints in some parts of south-western Nigeria. Livestock Research for Rural Development 16(8): 5–10.
3. Ajala M K. 2008. Peri-urban Small ruminant production in Northern Guinea Savanna, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 3(3): 138–46.
4. Ajala M K and Gefu J O. 2003. Socio-economic factors influencing small ruminant’s management practices in Kaduna state. Moor Journal of Agricultural Research 4: 274–80.
5. Alex R, Raghavan K C and Mercey K A. 2010. Prediction of body weight of Malabari goats from body measurements under field conditions. Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science 41: 21–27.