Author:
BARDHAN D,KUMAR SANJAY,SINGH RISHI KUMAR
Abstract
The study ascertained the use pattern of animal healthcare services (AHS) by the livestock farmers and to assess the impact of potential reforms in animal health delivery system (AHDS) in Uttar Pradesh, the largest state in India. A total of 1,037 households from all the 9 agro-climatic regions of the state were surveyed. Households were categorized in to poor (48%), medium (36.5%) and rich (15%) wealth categories to assess equity implications of potential reforms in AHDS. Analysis of use pattern of AHS revealed that quacks were the predominant AHS providers, followed by para-veterinarians and government veterinary officers (GVO’s). Out of the total sample visits made by GVO’s and para-vets, 58% and 66%, respectively, were attended at-home. The number of at-home visits by GVO’s per household increased with increase in wealth status. Richer households paid significantly higher prices per visit to AHS providers as compared to poor households. Even then, the average price paid by the poor households were substantially high. Contingent valuation method used to elicit farmers’ willingness to pay for animal healthcare services revealed that the amount they are willing to pay increased with increase in wealth status. Analysis of factors influencing farmers’ WTP revealed that lower wealth status and distance to market negatively influences the farmers’ likelihood of willing to pay a higher amount. On the other hand, household head education, easy credit availability and scale of milk production positively influenced the probability that a farmer will be willing to pay a higher amount.
Publisher
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference9 articles.
1. Ahuja V, Morrenhof J and Sen A. 2003. The delivery of veterinary services to poorer communities: the case of rural Orissa, India. Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz. 22(3): 931–48.
2. Bardhan D. 2010. Factors influencing farmers’ willingness to pay for animal health services and preference for private veterinary practitioners. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80(8): 790– 97.
3. Bardhan D, Kumar S, Anandsekaran G, Chaudhury J K, Meraj M, Singh R K, Verma M R, Kumar D, Kumar P T N, Ahmed Lone S, Mishra V, Mohanty B S, Korade N and De U K. 2017. The economic impact of peste des petits ruminants in India. The Economics of Animal Health. (Ed.) Rushton J. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 36(1): 245–63.
4. Bardhan D, Kumar S and Singh R K. 2015. Delivery of animal healthcare services in Uttar Pradesh: Present status, challenges and opportunities. Agricultural Economics Research Review 28 (Conf. No.): 127–136.
5. GoI. 2012. 19th Livestock Census 2012. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi.