Impact of European integration processes on judicial reform in Ukraine

Author:

Yara Olena

Abstract

The research relevance is determined by the European integration and identification of gaps and shortcomings arising in the process of harmonisation of Ukrainian legislation with the legal standards of the European Union, providing improvement areas. The study aims to characterise the reform of Ukraineʼs judicial system in the context of European integration. The following research methods were used in the study: systemic and structural, comparative legal, formal legal, and systematisation methods, as well as methods of synthesis, analysis, and generalisation. The study established that the judicial reform launched in 2016 is linked to Ukraineʼs plans to become a full-fledged member State of the European Union. It is determined that under the legal regime of martial law, some processes of reforming the judicial system to the standards of the European community may be slowed down. It is noted that the Copenhagen criteria, especially chapters 23 and 24, are among the key definitions for the implementation of justice and the judiciary in a country which is a member of the European Union. The analysis added that to accelerate the European integration processes in Ukraine, composition renewal of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine should be undertaken. The need to establish transparent qualification requirements for judges and modernise the selection process for the judiciary was outlined. The study concludes that it is necessary to fully launch the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, which is one of the key bodies of judicial self-government. The effective operation of this body is essential for maintaining the judiciary at a high professional level and ensuring compliance with the standards of justice. Furthermore, the study stressed the importance of continuing to effectively combat any manifestations of corruption in the activities of the judiciary and the judicial system as a whole. The study materials can be used to improve the functioning of the judicial system in Ukraine

Publisher

Scientific Journals Publishing House

Reference26 articles.

1. [1] Andriy Sybiha – on EU membership criteria: In the short term, more than 70 laws must be adopted. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-politics/3514311-sibiga-pro-kriterii-clenstva-v-es-u- korotkij-perspektivi-treba-uhvaliti-ponad-70-zakoniv.html.

2. [2] Bazarnyk, M.V. (2022). Influence of European integration processes on judicial reform in Ukraine. Scientific Notes of Lviv University of Business and Law, 32, 279-288.

3. [3] Bondarenko, V., & Yesimov, S. (2019). Public opinion as an assessment criterion of the National Police activities. Social and Legal Studios, 2(1), 39-45. doi: 10.32518/2617-4162-2019-1-39-45.

4. [4] Boryslavska, O. (2021). Judicial reforms in Eastern Europe: Ensuring the right to a fair trial or an attack on the independence of the judiciary? Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 1(9), 122-142. doi: 10.33327/AJEE- 18-4.1-a000049.

5. [5] Chapters of the acquis. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/ enlargement-policy/conditions-membership/chapters-acquis_en.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3