Some issues of judicial practice in proceedings on violations of the laws and customs of war

Author:

Taran Olena,Tarasenko Oleksandr,Cherniavskyi Serhii

Abstract

In the second year of the full-scale armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, the question of bringing the perpetrators to criminal responsibility for committing war crimes is urgent. At the same time, the criminal law qualification of actions within the scope of the provisions of Article 438 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine stays debatable. The purpose of this study was to investigate the content of some verdicts in proceedings on violations of the laws and customs of war, which were passed after February 24, 2022 in Ukraine, to identify the problems of law enforcement and the performance of procedural requirements regarding their content, since they acquired not only social significance and resonance, but also international ones, and the requirements for their quality can be defined as increased. The study used various methods of scientific research, the most effective and active among which were as follows: systemic-structural, comparative, analysis, and terminological. According to the results of processing the verdicts of the courts of first instance in the proceedings under Article 438 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, some issues were identified regarding the procedural order of special court proceedings. A causal connection between the violation of the laws and customs of war and the particular situation of a military conflict was established. The circumstances subject to proof for the commission of the specified criminal offence were substantiated and investigated, and the need to specify particular circumstances was argued. Emphasis was placed on the need to consider the particular war situation, the difference and the nature of the connection between these violations and the crime of aggression when proving a violation of the laws and customs of war, with the assumption of the possibility of their influence on political, legal, and other processes, even after its end. The practical significance of this study lies in the need to reflect the results of the application of legal norms related to the implementation of in absentia proceedings in verdicts, primarily regarding the procedure for informing the suspect, the accused about criminal proceedings, ensuring the right to defence and the effectiveness of its implementation

Publisher

Scientific Journals Publishing House

Reference28 articles.

1. [1] Adherence to the standards of investigation of war crimes confirms that Ukraine is a legal state with a European future. (2023). Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pres-centr/news/1387412/.

2. [2] Atamanov, О. (2021). Notification of suspicion to a person whose whereabouts has not been established or who is staying outside Ukraine. Kyiv: National Academy of Internal Affairs.

3. [3] Baranov, O. (2016). General principles of solving issues of application of the criminal law taking into account judicial practice. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.

4. [4] Batiuk, O., & Dmytriv, S. (2021). Regarding the organization of the investigation of war crimes. Social and Legal Studies, 3(13), 77-87.

5. [5] Bazov, V. (2008). Criminal liability for violation of the laws and customs of war (analysis of the composition of the crime) (Doctoral dissertation, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3