Abstract
It has been well over two decades now when new public management emerged as a management paradigm. As a management doctrine, new public management is centered on private sector practices implemented in the public sector. Although it has registered some success stories but most of the intended objectives were not met. The public value concept emerges as a response to the weaknesses of new public management and to better equip public sector managers to create public value for the society. The purpose of this study is to explore and evaluate public administration paradigms beyond new public management and to assess public value implications for public sector managers. This study employed cross-sectoral scope review of the extant literature and adopted a narrative approach. In-depth data was collected from top database searches of American and Australian Administrative journals.
Publisher
Readers Insight Publisher
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference47 articles.
1. Alford, J. (2002), Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social Exchange Perspective. Public Administration Review, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 337–346.
2. ANDRONICEANU, A. (2007), New Public Management, a Key Paradigm for Reforming Public Management in Romanian Administration, ADMINISTRAŢIE ŞI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC
3. Aucoin, P. (1990), Administrative reform in public management: paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums. Governance: an International Journal of Policy and Administration, 3, 115–137.
4. Aveyard, H. (2007), Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care. Maidenhead: Open University Press
5. Behn, R. D. (1998), The new public management paradigm and the search for democratic accountability. International Public Management Journal. DOI: 10.1016/S1096-7494(99)80088-9
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献