Abstract
The multimodality of the online learning environment allows students’ participation in different modes, relying either on video, audio or text-based communication. The current study explores the level of students’ willingness to communicate in the three modes of interaction in synchronous online English language lessons and compares it with their willingness to communicate in a conventional face-to-face language classroom. To this end, we recruited for this research 281 university students who took a course in English as part of their study programs. Relying on a cross-sectional survey design, we analyzed the data on the response variables by means of descriptive statistical tests and factorial ANOVAs. The results reveal that the students’ willingness to communicate in synchronous online classes decreases whenever they are required to activate more modes of communication. They also show that the highest willingness to communicate is found in conventional, face-to-face classrooms. An implication of the research is that the mode of communication has the potential to encourage or discourage WTC in EFL among students. It is proposed that the factors of responsibility and face-saving affect the students’ participation in online classes, aligning with the idea that WTC is a dynamic, fluid variable which changes depending on the situational context.
Publisher
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad
Reference32 articles.
1. Alwi, N. A. N. M. (2015). Language learning performance using engineering-based tasks via text chat. In: M. Thomas & H. Reinders (eds.), Contemporary Task-Based Language Teaching in Asia (pp. 193–210): London: Bloomsbury.
2. Baker, S., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50, 311–341. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00224
3. Barron, M., Cobo, C., Munoz-Najar, A., & Sanchez Ciarrusta, I. (2021). What is Hybrid Learning? How can countries get it right?. World Bank blog. Available at https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/what-hybridlearning-how-can-countries-get-it-right
4. Burroughs, N., Marie, V., & McCroskey, J. C. (2003). Relationships of self-perceived communication competence and communication apprehension with willingness to communicate: A comparison with first and second languages in Micronesia. Communication Research Reports, 20(3), 230–239. doi: 10.1080/08824090309388821
5. Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System 39/4: 468–479.