Affiliation:
1. State University of Ponta Grossa (Brazil)
2. Pablo de Olavide University (Spain) and State University of Ponta Grossa (Brazil)
3. Pablo de Olavide University (Spain)
Abstract
This paper aims to shed additional light on the existence of opportunistic and partisan political-business cycles in the Brazilian economy over the 1996-2016 period. To that end, it relies on two different approaches: (I) an Oaxaca model in the spirit of Blinder and Watson (2016); and (II) a DSGE model where fiscal and monetary policies are treated as political- regime dependent (Milani, 2010). By and large, our results from both exercises show that there existed an opportunistic behavior by all the governments studied as regards fiscal policy, and that political ideology played a role in shaping macroeconomic policies in some of the administrations that ran the country within the time span considered. Specifically, as our DSGE exercise illustrates, President Dilma Rouseff’s fiscal management differed significantly from previous governments’. In ad¬dition, we do not find any evidence of political business cycle of any type when it comes to monetary policy, in line with what the consensus in this literature states for the case of Brazil.
Publisher
Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas (CIDE)
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference34 articles.
1. Alesina, A., & Roubini, N. (1992). Political cycles in OECD economies. The Review of Economic Studies, 59, 663-688.
2. Alesina, A., Cohen, G. D. & Roubini, N. (1992). Macroeconomic policy and elections in OECD democracies. Economics & Politics, 4, 1-30.
3. Araújo, C. H. V. & Ferreira, P. C. G. (1999). Reforma tributária, efeitos alocativos e impactos de bem-estar. Revista Brasileira de Economia. 53, 133-166.
4. Bittencourt, J. L. & Hillbrecht, R. O. (2003). Ciclo Político na Economia Brasileira: um Teste para a Execução Orçamentária dos Governos Estaduais-1983/2000. In Anais do XXXI Encontro Nacional de Economia.
5. Blinder, A. S. & Watson, M. W. (2016). Presidents and the US Economy: An econometric explo¬ration. American Economic Review, 106, 1015-45.