Abstract
PURPOSE: The present review aimed to verify the meta-effects of resistance training (RT) or protein supplementation (PS) on usual gait speed (UGS) in postmenopausal women and the additive effect of RT and PS on UGS.METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed/Medline and Web of Science (core collection) was performed from inception to December 31, 2021. Electronic search methods were used to identify 18 relevant randomized controlled trials. Meta-analyses of standardized mean difference (SMD) calculated using Hedges’ g between RT and/or PS groups versus control groups were conducted using a random-effects model. The meta-effects are presented in a forest plot with a 95% confidence interval (CI).RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed that RT significantly improved UGS (SMD, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.12-0.68; p=.006), while PS did not improve UGS (SMD, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.80 to 0.46; p=.601). A subgroup analysis indicated that there were significant increases in UGS after both ‘RT-only intervention (SMD, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.59; p=.046)’ and ‘RT combined with balance training (BT) (SMD, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.17-1.13; p=.008)’, while there was no significant increase in UGS after ‘RT combined with power training (PT) (SMD, -0.08; 95% CI, -0.62 to 0.45; p=.765)’. There was no additive effect on UGS after RT combined with PS (SMD, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.36 to 0.24; p=.699).CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that RT significantly improved UGS in postmenopausal women, and adding BT to RT further improved UGS. In addition, there was no significant improvement in UGS after PS in postmenopausal women, and no additive effect on UGS after RT combined with PS.
Publisher
Korean Society of Exercise Physiology
Subject
Physiology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献