Author:
,Bastani Spencer,Karlsson Kristina, ,Kolsrud Jonas, ,Waldenström Daniel,
Abstract
Using administrative tax and military records, we show that cognitive ability is more strongly associated with capital income than with labor income. This result holds across intensive and extensive margins, across different income types, and after controlling for education, occupation, inheritance, and parental background. Higher ability individuals save more, are better at selecting high-return stocks, hold more risky assets, and are less likely to live hand-to-mouth. Capital market returns are higher for cognitive ability than for non-cognitive skills, and the difference is stable over time. Rising capital shares, fueled by technological progress, could therefore exacerbate cognitive ability-based economic inequality.
Publisher
Institutionen för nationalekonomi och statistik, Linnéuniversitetet
Reference70 articles.
1. Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2018). The Race Between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares and Employment. American Economic Review, 108(6):1488-1542.
2. Adermon, A., Lindahl, M., and Waldenström, D. (2018). Intergenerational Wealth Mobility and the Role of Inheritance: Evidence from Multiple Generations. Economic Journal, 128(612):F482-F513.
3. Agarwal, S. and Mazumder, B. (2013). Cognitive Abilities and Household Financial Decision Making. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(1):193-207.
4. Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., Gravoueille, M., Lequien, M., and Stantcheva, S. (2023). Tax Simplicity or Simplicity of Evasion? Evidence from Self-Employment Taxes in France. NBER Working Paper 24049. Updated May 2023.
5. Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., and Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2):31-50.