Author:
Bonetto Eric,Carsel Timothy S,Adam-Troian Jais,Varet Florent,Keeran Lindsay M,Lo Monaco Grégory,Piermattéo Anthony
Abstract
Deviance Punishment is an important issue for social-psychological research. Group members tend to punish deviance through rejection, ostracism and – more commonly – negative judgments. Subjective Group Dynamics proposes to account for social judgement patterns of deviant and conformist individuals. Relying on a group identity management perspective, one of the model’s core predictions is that the judgment of a deviant target depends on group membership. More specifically, the model predicts that deviant ingroup members should be judged more negatively than outgroup ones. Although this effect has been repeatedly observed over the past decades, there is a current lack of sufficiently powered studies in the literature. For the first time, we conducted tests of Subjective Group Dynamics in France and the US to investigate whether ingroup deviants were judged more harshly than outgroup ones. Across six experiments and an internal mini meta-analysis, we observed no substantial difference in judgment between ingroup and outgroup deviant targets, d = -0.01, 95% CI[-0.07, 0.06]. The findings’ implications for deviance management research are discussed.
Subject
General Environmental Science
Reference55 articles.
1. Abrams D. (2010). Deviance. In J.M. Levine & M.A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations (pp. 206-211). Sage.
2. Abrams, D., Hogg, M.A., & Marques, J.M. (2005). A social psychological framework for understanding social inclusion and exclusion. Psychology Press.
3. Abrams, D., Rutland, A., & Cameron, L. (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: Children's judgments of normative and deviant in-group and out-group individuals. Child Development, 74, 1840-1856. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00641.x
4. Abrams, D., Travaglino, G.A., Marques, J.M., Pinto, I., & Levine, J.M. (2018). Deviance credit: Tolerance of deviant ingroup leaders is mediated by their accrual of prototypicality and conferral of their right to be supported. Journal of Social Issues, 74, 36-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.2018.74.issue-1/issuetoc
5. Albarracin, D., Johnson, B.T., & Zanna, M.P. (2005). The handbook of attitudes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献