Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Abstract
Abstract
Background: A clear understanding of factors affecting patients’ perception of quality of life (QOL) would be useful for improving continuous care in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.
Objective: To examine the causal relationships between cardiac self-efficacy, social support, left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), angina, dyspnea, depression, vital exhaustion, functional performance, and QOL in CAD patients experiencing postpercutaneous coronary intervention (post-PCI).
Methods: We used a research survey for causal analysis design to explore the theoretical linkage, guided by the revised Wilson and Cleary model, between QOL interest variables and patient QOL. The 303 subjects were all post-PCI CAD patients. All participants completed the following surveys: (1) a demographic data questionnaire, (2) a QOL Index (Cardiac version IV), (3) the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, (4) the Cardiac Self-efficacy Scale, (5) the Social Support Questionnaire, (6) the Rose Questionnaire for angina, (7) the Rose Dyspnea Scale, (8) the SF-36: vitality subscale, and (9) the Functional Performance Inventory Short-Form, with reliability ranging from 0.72 to 0.98. Data were analyzed using a linear structural relationship analysis.
Results: The postulated model was found to fit the empirical data and explained 54% of the variance in quality of life (χ2 = 1.90, df = 3, p = 0.59, χ2/df = 0.63, root mean square error of approximation = 0.00, Goodness of Fit Index = 0.99, Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index = 0.98). Social support, depression, and vital exhaustion were found to significantly and directly affect the QOL of post-PCI CAD patients. Cardiac self-efficacy was the only variable that had an indirect effect on quality of life (β = 0.21, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Health care providers should be aware of the significant effects of social support, depression, vital exhaustion, and self-efficacy on QOL, and develop appropriate nursing interventions to improve quality of life in post-PCI CAD patients.
Reference40 articles.
1. 1. Ferrans CE, Zerwic JJ, Wilbur JE, Larson JL. Conceptual model of health-related quality of life. J Nurs scholarsh. 2005; 37:336-42.
2. 2. Cassar A, Holmes DR Jr, Rihal CS, Gersh BJ. Chronic coronary artery disease: diagnosis and management. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009; 84:1130-46.10.4065/mcp.2009.0391
3. 3. Barnason SA, Zimmerman LM, Brey B, Catlin S, Nieveen JL. Patterns of recovery following percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot study. Appl Nurs Res. 2006; 19:31-7.10.1016/j.apnr.2004.12.002
4. 4. Durmaz T, Ozdemir O, Ozdemir BA, Keles T, Bayram NA, Bozkurt E. Factors affecting quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease. Turk J Med Sci. 2009; 39:343-51.
5. 5. Khuwatsumrit K. Quality of life after coronary artery bypass graft. Master of Nursing Science (Adult Nursing) Thesis, Faculty of Graduate Studies, Mahidol University. 1996.