Determinants of Guideline Use in Primary Care Physical Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Attitudes, Knowledge, and Behavior

Author:

Bernhardsson Susanne1,Johansson Kajsa2,Nilsen Per3,Öberg Birgitta4,Larsson Maria E.H.5

Affiliation:

1. S. Bernhardsson, PT, MSc, Region Västra Götaland, Närhälsan Öckerö Rehabilitation, Strandvägen 35, 475 40 Hönö, Sweden, and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

2. K. Johansson, PT, PhD, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University.

3. P. Nilsen, PhD, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Health Care Analysis, Linköping University.

4. B. Öberg, PT, PhD, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University.

5. M.E.H. Larsson, PT, PhD, Region Västra Götaland, Närhälsan Research and Development Unit, Primary Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden, and The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology/Physiotherapy, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding of attitudes, knowledge, and behavior related to evidence-based practice (EBP) and use of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in primary care physical therapy is limited.ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were: (1) to investigate self-reported attitudes, knowledge, behavior, prerequisites, and barriers related to EBP and guideline use among physical therapists in primary care and (2) to explore associations of self-reported use of guidelines with these social cognitive factors along with demographic and workplace characteristics.DesignThis was a cross-sectional survey.MethodsA web-based survey of 419 physical therapists in primary care in western Sweden was performed. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to examine factors associated with guideline use.ResultsThe response rate was 64.7%. Most respondents had positive attitudes toward EBP and guidelines: 90% considered EBP necessary, and 96% considered guidelines important. Approximately two thirds reported confidence in finding and using evidence. One third reported being aware of guidelines. Thirteen percent knew where to find guidelines, and only 9% reported having easy access to guidelines. Fewer than half reported using guidelines frequently. The most important barriers to using guidelines were lack of time, poor availability, and limited access to guidelines. Young age and brief work experience were associated with positive attitudes toward EBP. A postgraduate degree was associated with higher application of EBP. Positive attitudes, awareness of guidelines, considering guidelines to facilitate practice, and knowing how to integrate patient preferences with guideline use were associated with frequent use of guidelines.LimitationsData were self-reported, which may have increased the risk of social desirability bias.ConclusionsUse of guidelines was not as frequent as could be expected in view of the positive attitudes toward EBP and guidelines among physical therapists. Awareness of and perceived access to guidelines were limited. The identified determinants can be addressed when developing guideline implementation strategies.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference52 articles.

1. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't;Sackett;BMJ,1996

2. A description of the trials, reviews, and practice guidelines indexed in the PEDro database;Maher;Phys Ther,2008

3. Centre for Evidence-Based Physiotherapy, The George Institute for Global Health. Physical Therapy Evidence Database PEDro. Available at: http://www.pedro.org.au/. Accessed August 29, 2013.

4. Evidence-based implementation of evidence-based medicine;Grol;Jt Comm J Qual Improv,1999

5. Physiotherapists' use of evidence based practice: a cross-national study;Turner;Physiother Res Int,1997

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3