The Contribution of Conceptual Frameworks to Knowledge Translation Interventions in Physical Therapy

Author:

Hudon Anne1,Gervais Mathieu-Joël2,Hunt Matthew3

Affiliation:

1. A. Hudon, PT, MSc, PhD candidate in Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Mailing address: École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7 Canada.

2. M-J. Gervais, PhD candidate, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, CJM-IU-UQÀM Chair on Knowledge Translation in the Field of Child and Family Welfare.

3. M. Hunt, PT, PhD, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, and Assistant Professor, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Abstract

There is growing recognition of the importance of knowledge translation activities in physical therapy to ensure that research findings are integrated into clinical practice, and increasing numbers of knowledge translation interventions are being conducted. Although various frameworks have been developed to guide and facilitate the process of translating knowledge into practice, these tools have been infrequently used in physical therapy knowledge translation studies to date. Knowledge translation in physical therapy implicates multiple stakeholders and environments and involves numerous steps. In light of this complexity, the use of explicit conceptual frameworks by clinicians and researchers conducting knowledge translation interventions is associated with a range of potential benefits. This perspective article argues that such frameworks are important resources to promote the uptake of new evidence in physical therapist practice settings. Four key benefits associated with the use of conceptual frameworks in designing and implementing knowledge translation interventions are identified, and limits related to their use are considered. A sample of 5 conceptual frameworks is evaluated, and how they address common barriers to knowledge translation in physical therapy is assessed. The goal of this analysis is to provide guidance to physical therapists seeking to identify a framework to support the design and implementation of a knowledge translation intervention. Finally, the use of a conceptual framework is illustrated through a case example. Increased use of conceptual frameworks can have a positive impact on the field of knowledge translation in physical therapy and support the development and implementation of robust and effective knowledge translation interventions that help span the research-practice gap.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference73 articles.

1. A review of the literature on evidence-based practice in physical therapy;Schreiber;Int J Allied Health Sci Pract,2005

2. The peril of inadequate evidence;Jette;Phys Ther,2005

3. Management of low back pain by physical therapists in Quebec: how are we doing?;Derghazarian;Physiother Can,2011

4. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States;McGlynn;N Engl J Med,2003

5. Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation;Graham;Acad Emerg Med,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3