Effectiveness of Mat Pilates or Equipment-Based Pilates Exercises in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

da Luz Maurício Antônio1,Costa Leonardo Oliveira Pena2,Fuhro Fernanda Ferreira3,Manzoni Ana Carolina Taccolini4,Oliveira Naiane Teixeira Bastos5,Cabral Cristina Maria Nunes6

Affiliation:

1. M.A. da Luz Jr, PT, MS, Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

2. L.O.P. Costa, PT, PhD, Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, and Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

3. F.F. Fuhro, PT, Physical Therapy Department, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo.

4. A.C.T. Manzoni, PT, Physical Therapy Department, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo.

5. N.T.B. Oliveira, PT, Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo.

6. C.M.N. Cabral, PT, PhD, Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Rua Cesário Galeno 475, São Paulo, Brazil CEP 03071-000.

Abstract

Background The Pilates method has been widely used to treat patients with chronic low back pain. Pilates exercises can be performed in 2 ways: by using specific equipment or without it (also known as mat Pilates). There are no studies, however, that have compared the effectiveness of mat Pilates with that of equipment-based Pilates. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of mat Pilates and equipment-based Pilates in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Design A 2-arm randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor was conducted. Setting The study was conducted at a private physical therapy clinic in Brazil. Patients Eighty-six patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain participated. Intervention The patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: a mat Pilates group (n=43) and an equipment-based Pilates group (n=43). The participants in both groups attended 12 Pilates sessions over a period of 6 weeks. Measurements The primary outcomes were pain intensity and disability. The secondary outcomes were global perceived effect, patient's specific disability, and kinesiophobia. A blinded assessor evaluated the outcomes at baseline and 6 weeks and 6 months after randomization. Results After 6 months, there was a statistically significant difference for disability (mean difference=3.0 points, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.6 to 5.4), specific disability (mean difference=−1.1 points, 95% CI=−2.0 to −0.1), and kinesiophobia (mean difference=4.9 points, 95% CI=1.6 to 8.2) in favor of equipment-based Pilates. No differences were found for the remaining outcomes. Conclusions Equipment-based Pilates was superior to mat Pilates in the 6-month follow-up for the outcomes of disability and kinesiophobia. These benefits were not observed for pain intensity and global perceived effect in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3