Effectiveness of Stretch for the Treatment and Prevention of Contractures in People With Neurological Conditions: A Systematic Review

Author:

Katalinic Owen M.1,Harvey Lisa A.2,Herbert Robert D.3

Affiliation:

1. O.M. Katalinic, BAppSc(Physiotherapy), is Physiotherapist, Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. This systematic review was done in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Mr Katalinic's Master of Philosophy (MPhil) degree, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney.

2. L.A. Harvey, BAppSc(Physiotherapy), GradDipAppSc(ExSpSc), MAppSc(Physiotherapy), PhD, is Associate Professor, Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, PO Box 6 Ryde, New South Wales, 2112, Australia.

3. R.D. Herbert, BAppSc(Physiotherapy), MAppSc(ExSpSc), PhD, is Associate Professor, Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

Background Contractures are a disabling complication of neurological conditions that are commonly managed with stretch. Objective The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures. The review is part of a more-detailed Cochrane review. Only the results of the studies including patients with neurological conditions are reported here. Data Sources Electronic searches were conducted in June 2010 in the following computerized databases: Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment Database (HTA), MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, SCI-EXPANDED, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Study Eligibility Criteria The review included randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials of stretch applied for the purposes of treating or preventing contractures in people with neurological conditions. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcome measures were joint mobility (range of motion) and quality of life. Secondary outcome measures were pain, spasticity, activity limitation, and participation restriction. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Results Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies provide moderate-quality evidence that stretch has a small immediate effect on joint mobility (mean difference=3°, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0° to 5°) and high-quality evidence that stretch has little or no short-term or long-term effects on joint mobility (mean difference=1° and 0°, respectively, 95% CI=0° to 3° and −2° to 2°, respectively). There is little or no effect of stretch on pain, spasticity, and activity limitation. Limitations No studies were retrieved that investigated the effects of stretch for longer than 6 months. Conclusion Regular stretch does not produce clinically important changes in joint mobility, pain, spasticity, or activity limitation in people with neurological conditions.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3