Breast Cancer–Related Lymphedema: Comparing Direct Costs of a Prospective Surveillance Model and a Traditional Model of Care

Author:

Stout Nicole L.1,Pfalzer Lucinda A.2,Springer Barbara3,Levy Ellen4,McGarvey Charles L.5,Danoff Jerome V.6,Gerber Lynn H.7,Soballe Peter W.8

Affiliation:

1. N.L. Stout, MPT, CLT-LANA, National Naval Medical Center, Breast Care Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bldg 10, 4 West, Bethesda, MD 20814 (USA).

2. L.A. Pfalzer, PT, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Michigan–Flint, Flint, Michigan.

3. B. Springer, PT, PhD, Proponency Office for Rehabilitation and Reintegration, Office of the Surgeon General, Falls Church, Virginia.

4. E. Levy, PT, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

5. C.L. McGarvey, PT, DPT, CLM Consulting, Rockville, Maryland.

6. J.V. Danoff, PT, PhD, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, and School of Public Health and Health Services, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

7. L.H. Gerber, MD, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.

8. P.W. Soballe, MD, Naval Hospital, San Diego, California.

Abstract

Secondary prevention involves monitoring and screening to prevent negative sequelae from chronic diseases such as cancer. Breast cancer treatment sequelae, such as lymphedema, may occur early or late and often negatively affect function. Secondary prevention through prospective physical therapy surveillance aids in early identification and treatment of breast cancer–related lymphedema (BCRL). Early intervention may reduce the need for intensive rehabilitation and may be cost saving. This perspective article compares a prospective surveillance model with a traditional model of impairment-based care and examines direct treatment costs associated with each program. Intervention and supply costs were estimated based on the Medicare 2009 physician fee schedule for 2 groups: (1) a prospective surveillance model group (PSM group) and (2) a traditional model group (TM group). The PSM group comprised all women with breast cancer who were receiving interval prospective surveillance, assuming that one third would develop early-stage BCRL. The prospective surveillance model includes the cost of screening all women plus the cost of intervention for early-stage BCRL. The TM group comprised women referred for BCRL treatment using a traditional model of referral based on late-stage lymphedema. The traditional model cost includes the direct cost of treating patients with advanced-stage lymphedema. The cost to manage early-stage BCRL per patient per year using a prospective surveillance model is $636.19. The cost to manage late-stage BCRL per patient per year using a traditional model is $3,124.92. The prospective surveillance model is emerging as the standard of care in breast cancer treatment and is a potential cost-saving mechanism for BCRL treatment. Further analysis of indirect costs and utility is necessary to assess cost-effectiveness. A shift in the paradigm of physical therapy toward a prospective surveillance model is warranted.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3