Catastrophizing During and After Pregnancy: Associations With Lumbopelvic Pain and Postpartum Physical Ability

Author:

Olsson Christina B.1,Grooten Wilhelmus J.A.2,Nilsson-Wikmar Lena3,Harms-Ringdahl Karin4,Lundberg Mari5

Affiliation:

1. C.B. Olsson, PhD, Primärvårdsrehab Serafen, Stockholm, Sweden; CeFAM (Center for Family and Community Medicine), Stockholm County Council, Huddinge, Sweden; and Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Mailing address: CeFAM, Alfred Nobels Allé 12, 141 83 Huddinge, Sweden.

2. W.J.A. Grooten, PhD, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet.

3. L. Nilsson-Wikmar, PhD, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet.

4. K. Harms-Ringdahl, PhD, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Physical Therapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

5. M. Lundberg, PhD, Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Abstract

Background There is a lack of knowledge about the possible role of catastrophizing in lumbopelvic pain during and after pregnancy and in postpartum physical ability. Objective The aims of this study were to explore how catastrophizing fluctuates over time during and after pregnancy and to investigate the associations between catastrophizing and lumbopelvic pain and between catastrophizing and postpartum physical ability. Design A prospective questionnaire was used. Methods The Pain Catastrophizing Scale was used to assess exaggerated negative thoughts about pain experiences in weeks 19 to 21 and weeks 34 to 37 of pregnancy and at 6 months postpartum. The Disability Rating Index was used to assess physical ability at 6 months postpartum. The occurrence of lumbopelvic pain was reported by participants. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used for the analyses. Results A total of 242 of 324 women were categorized according to reported levels of catastrophizing. A majority of women (57.9%) reported not catastrophizing at all test occasions, whereas 10.3% reported catastrophizing at all occasions. For the remaining 31.8%, the levels of catastrophizing varied over time. Women who catastrophized at 1 or more of the occasions reported higher proportions of postpartum lumbopelvic pain and had more restricted postpartum physical ability than women who did not catastrophize. Limitations The fact that some women did not complete the questionnaire at all test occasions might have reduced the generalizability of the results. Conclusions The common idea that levels of catastrophizing are “stable” within personality should be reconsidered, because for 1 of 3 women, the levels of catastrophizing changed over time. A majority of women reported not catastrophizing. However, catastrophizing in relation to pregnancy seems to be associated with lumbopelvic pain and postpartum physical ability. The results indicated that the role of catastrophizing in this context should be studied further.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference44 articles.

1. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain;Airaksinen;Eur Spine J,2006

2. Low back trouble in a general population of 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-year-old men and women: study design, representativeness and basic results;Biering-Sorensen;Dan Med Bull,1982

3. The relationship of low-back pain to pregnancy and gynecologic factors;Svensson;Spine,1990

4. Lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy: a 3-year follow-up;Noren;Eur Spine J,2002

5. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (ppp), i: terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence;Wu;Eur Spine J,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3