Measurement Properties of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Systematic Review

Author:

Speksnijder Caroline M.1,Koppenaal Tjarco2,Knottnerus J. André3,Spigt Mark4,Staal J. Bart5,Terwee Caroline B.6

Affiliation:

1. C.M. Speksnijder, PT, PhD, Physical Therapy Science, Program in Clinical Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Intern Post G05.122, PO Box 85.500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Radboud University Medical Center, IQ Healthcare, Radboud

2. T. Koppenaal, PT, MSc, Department of Allied Health Professions, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

3. J.A. Knottnerus, PhD, Department of General Practice, Care and Public Health Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

4. M. Spigt, PT, PhD, Department of General Practice, Care and Public Health Institute, Maastricht University.

5. J.B. Staal, PT, PhD, Research Group of Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, and Radboud University Medical Center, IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences.

6. C.B. Terwee, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Abstract

Abstract Background The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) has been translated into different languages, and several studies on its measurement properties have been done. Purpose The purpose of this review was to critically appraise and compare the measurement properties, when possible, of all language versions of the QBPDS by systematically reviewing the methodological quality and results of the available studies. Method Bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) were searched for articles with the key words “Quebec,” “back,” “pain,” and “disability” in combination with a methodological search filter for finding studies on measurement properties concerning the development or evaluation of the measurement properties of the QBPDS in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Assessment of the methodological quality was carried out by the reviewers using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist for both the original language version of the QBPDS in English and French and all translated versions. The results of the measurement properties were rated based on criteria proposed by Terwee et al. Results The search strategy resulted in identification of 1,436 publications, and 27 articles were included in the systematic review. There was limited-to-moderate evidence of good reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the QBPDS for the different language versions, but for no language version was evidence available for all measurement properties. Conclusion For research and clinical practice, caution is advised when using the QBPDS to measure disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Strong evidence is lacking on all measurement properties for each language version of the QBPDS.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference59 articles.

1. Individual and occupational determinants of low back pain according to various definitions of low back pain;Ozguler;J Epidemiol Community Health,2000

2. Low-back pain definitions in occupational studies were categorized for a meta-analysis using Delphi consensus methods;Griffith;J Clin Epidemiol,2007

3. Antidepressants for non-specific low back pain;Urquhart;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2008

4. Low back pain;Ehrlich;Bull World Health Organ,2003

5. Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale;Christakou;J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3