Further Development and Validation of the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development–Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS)

Author:

Caçola Priscila M.1,Gabbard Carl2,Montebelo Maria I.L.3,Santos Denise C.C.4

Affiliation:

1. P.M. Caçola, PhD, Developmental Motor Cognition Lab, Department of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, 500 W Nedderman Dr, Arlington, TX 76019 (USA).

2. C. Gabbard, EdD, Child Motor Development Lab, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.

3. M.I.L. Montebelo, PhD, School of Exact and Nature Sciences, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

4. D.C.C. Santos, PhD, Physical Therapy Graduate Program and Human Movement Sciences Program, School of Health Sciences, Methodist University of Piracicaba.

Abstract

Background Affordances in the home environment may play a significant role in infant motor development. Objective The purpose of this study was to further develop and validate the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development–Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS), an inventory that measures the quantity and quality of motor affordances in the home. Design A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate criteria for content validity, reliability, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability of the instrument. Methods A pilot version of the inventory with 5 dimensions was used for expert panel analysis and administered to parents of infants (N=419). Data were analyzed with Cronbach alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), ceiling and floor effects, and item and dimension interpretability analyses for creation of a scoring system with descriptive categories for each dimension and total score. Results Average agreement among the expert panel was 95% across all evaluation criteria. Cronbach alpha values with the 41-item scale ranged between .639 and .824 for the separate dimensions, with a total value of .824 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]=.781, .862). The ICC values were .990 for interrater reliability and .949 for intrarater reliability. There was a ceiling effect on 3 questions for the Inside Space dimension and on 3 questions for the Variety of Stimulation dimension. These results demonstrated the need for reduction in total items (from 41 to 35) and the combination of space dimensions. After removal of questions, internal consistency was .766 (95% CI=.729, .800) for total score. Overall assessment categories were created as: less than adequate, moderately adequate, adequate, and excellent. Limitations The inventory does not determine specific use (time, frequency) of affordances in the home, and it does not account for infants' out-of-home activities. Conclusions The AHEMD-IS is a reliable and valid instrument to assess affordances in the home environment that promote infant motor development.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3