Explanatory Variables for Adult Patients' Self-Reported Recovery After Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain

Author:

van Rijn Rogier M.1,Willemsen Sten P.2,Verhagen Arianne P.3,Koes Bart W.4,Bierma-Zeinstra Sita M.A.5

Affiliation:

1. R.M. van Rijn, MSc, is a PhD student at the Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Room WK-109, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

2. S.P. Willemsen, MSc, is Statistician, Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center.

3. A.P. Verhagen, PT, PhD, is Senior Researcher, Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center.

4. B.W. Koes, PhD, is Professor, Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center.

5. S.M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra, PT, PhD, is Professor, Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center.

Abstract

Background Longitudinal research on musculoskeletal disorders often makes use of a single measure of recovery, despite the large variation in reported recovery that exists. Patients with an acute ankle sprain often experience no pain or functional disability following treatment, yet report not being fully recovered, or vice versa. Objective The purpose of this study was to find explanatory variables for reporting recovery by analyzing the extent to which different outcomes (eg, pain intensity) were associated with recovery and how baseline scores of different variables influence this association in adult patients after acute lateral ankle sprain. Design This was a cohort study based on data collected in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Methods This study was constructed within the framework of an RCT. One hundred two patients who incurred an acute ankle sprain were included. Recovery, pain intensity, giving way of the ankle, and Ankle Function Score (AFS) were assessed during the RCT at baseline and at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months postinjury. Mean differences were calculated between baseline and follow-up. Associations were calculated using linear mixed models, and the influence of baseline scores on these associations was determined using linear regression with interaction. Results Associations were found between recovery and the mean differences of pain during running on flat and rough surfaces (4 and 8 weeks, 3 months) and between recovery and the mean difference of giving way of the ankle during walking on a rough surface (8 weeks, 3 months). Limitations This study used data collected from an RCT. Therefore, the study was limited to the outcomes measured in that trial, and some explanatory factors easily could have been missed. Conclusions This study is the first to identify explanatory variables for reporting recovery in adults after ankle sprain. Pain intensity and giving way of the ankle measured during high ankle load activities make it easier to measure and to generalize recovery in this population and should be the primary outcome measures of interest. This study indicates the huge need to reach consensus about primary outcome measures for research in patients sustaining ankle sprains.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3