A Physical Function Test for Use in the Intensive Care Unit: Validity, Responsiveness, and Predictive Utility of the Physical Function ICU Test (Scored)

Author:

Denehy Linda1,de Morton Natalie A.2,Skinner Elizabeth H.3,Edbrooke Lara4,Haines Kimberley5,Warrillow Stephen6,Berney Sue7

Affiliation:

1. L. Denehy, BAppSc(Physio), GradDipPhysio(Cardiothoracic), PhD, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3000.

2. N.A. de Morton, BAppSci(Physio), PhD, Department of Physiotherapy, Donvale Rehabilitation Hospital & Peninsula Private Hospital, Ramsay Health Victoria, Victoria, Australia.

3. E.H. Skinner, BPhysiotherapy(Hons), PhD, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne; Allied Health Research Unit, Southern Health, Victoria, Australia; and Physiotherapy Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

4. L. Edbrooke, BAppSci(Physio), GradDipEpidemiolBiostats, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne.

5. K. Haines, BHSc(Physiotherapy), Physiotherapy Department, Austin Health.

6. S. Warrillow, MBBS, FCICM, FRACP, Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health.

7. S. Berney, BPhysio, MPhysio, PhD, Physiotherapy Department, Austin Health.

Abstract

Background Several tests have recently been developed to measure changes in patient strength and functional outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). The original Physical Function ICU Test (PFIT) demonstrates reliability and sensitivity. Objective The aims of this study were to further develop the original PFIT, to derive an interval score (the PFIT-s), and to test the clinimetric properties of the PFIT-s. Design A nested cohort study was conducted. Methods One hundred forty-four and 116 participants performed the PFIT at ICU admission and discharge, respectively. Original test components were modified using principal component analysis. Rasch analysis examined the unidimensionality of the PFIT, and an interval score was derived. Correlations tested validity, and multiple regression analyses investigated predictive ability. Responsiveness was assessed using the effect size index (ESI), and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated. Results The shoulder lift component was removed. Unidimensionality of combined admission and discharge PFIT-s scores was confirmed. The PFIT-s displayed moderate convergent validity with the Timed “Up & Go” Test (r=−.60), the Six-Minute Walk Test (r=.41), and the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score (rho=.49). The ESI of the PFIT-s was 0.82, and the MCID was 1.5 points (interval scale range=0–10). A higher admission PFIT-s score was predictive of: an MRC score of ≥48, increased likelihood of discharge home, reduced likelihood of discharge to inpatient rehabilitation, and reduced acute care hospital length of stay. Limitations Scoring of sit-to-stand assistance required is subjective, and cadence cutpoints used may not be generalizable. Conclusions The PFIT-s is a safe and inexpensive test of physical function with high clinical utility. It is valid, responsive to change, and predictive of key outcomes. It is recommended that the PFIT-s be adopted to test physical function in the ICU.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference41 articles.

1. Early exercise in critically ill patients enhances short-term functional recovery;Burtin;Crit Care Med,2009

2. Early intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respiratory failure;Morris;Crit Care Med,2008

3. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial;Schweickert;Lancet,2009

4. University of Rochester Acute Care Evaluation: development of a new functional outcome measure for the acute care setting;DiCicco;J Acute Care Phys Ther,2010

5. Development of a physical function outcome measure (PFIT) and a pilot exercise training protocol for use in intensive care;Skinner;Crit Care Resusc,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3