The STarT Back Screening Tool and Individual Psychological Measures: Evaluation of Prognostic Capabilities for Low Back Pain Clinical Outcomes in Outpatient Physical Therapy Settings

Author:

Beneciuk Jason M.1,Bishop Mark D.2,Fritz Julie M.3,Robinson Michael E.4,Asal Nabih R.5,Nisenzon Anne N.6,George Steven Z.7

Affiliation:

1. J.M. Beneciuk, PT, PhD, MPH, FAAOMPT, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, and Clinical Research Center, Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, Florida. Mailing address: Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health & Health Professions, University of Florida Health Science Center, Box 100154, Gainesville, FL 32610-0154 (USA).

2. M.D. Bishop, PT, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy and Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, University of Florida.

3. J.M. Fritz, PT, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah.

4. M.E. Robinson, PhD, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology and Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, University of Florida.

5. N.R. Asal, PhD, FACE, Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida.

6. A.N. Nisenzon, PhD, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida.

7. S.Z. George, PT, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy and Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, University of Florida. Mailing address: Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health & Health Professions, University of Florida Health Science Center, Box 100154, Gainesville, FL 32610-0154 (USA).

Abstract

BackgroundPsychologically informed practice emphasizes routine identification of modifiable psychological risk factors being highlighted.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to test the predictive validity of the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) in comparison with single-construct psychological measures for 6-month clinical outcomes.DesignThis was an observational, prospective cohort study.MethodsPatients (n=146) receiving physical therapy for low back pain were administered the SBT and a battery of psychological measures (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire physical activity scale and work scale [FABQ-PA and FABQ-W, respectively], Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS], 11-item version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia [TSK-11], and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) at initial evaluation and 4 weeks later. Treatment was at the physical therapist's discretion. Clinical outcomes consisted of pain intensity and self-reported disability. Prediction of 6-month clinical outcomes was assessed for intake SBT and psychological measure scores using multiple regression models while controlling for other prognostic variables. In addition, the predictive capabilities of intake to 4-week changes in SBT and psychological measure scores for 6-month clinical outcomes were assessed.ResultsIntake pain intensity scores (β=.39 to .45) and disability scores (β=.47 to .60) were the strongest predictors in all final regression models, explaining 22% and 24% and 43% and 48% of the variance for the respective clinical outcome at 6 months. Neither SBT nor psychological measure scores improved prediction of 6-month pain intensity. The SBT overall scores (β=.22) and SBT psychosocial scores (β=.25) added to the prediction of disability at 6 months. Four-week changes in TSK-11 scores (β=−.18) were predictive of pain intensity at 6 months. Four-week changes in FABQ-PA scores (β=−.21), TSK-11 scores (β=−.20) and SBT overall scores (β=−.18) were predictive of disability at 6 months.LimitationsPhysical therapy treatment was not standardized or accounted for in the analysis.ConclusionsPrediction of clinical outcomes by psychology-based measures was dependent upon the clinical outcome domain of interest. Similar to studies from the primary care setting, initial screening with the SBT provided additional prognostic information for 6-month disability and changes in SBT overall scores may provide important clinical decision-making information for treatment monitoring.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3