Physical Therapists’ Experiences Updating the Clinical Management of Walking Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Qualitative Study

Author:

Salbach Nancy M.1,Veinot Paula2,Rappolt Susan3,Bayley Mark4,Burnett Dawn5,Judd Maria6,Jaglal Susan B.7

Affiliation:

1. N.M. Salbach, PT, PhD, is Assistant Professor and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario Clinician Scientist, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7 Canada.

2. P. Veinot, MHSc, is Research Consultant, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

3. S. Rappolt, OT, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto.

4. M. Bayley, MD, FRCPC, is Associate Professor, Division of Psychiatry, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, and Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto.

5. D. Burnett, PT, PhD, is Research Coordinator, Interprofessional Rehabilitation University Clinic in Primary Health Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

6. M. Judd, PT, MSc, is Senior Program Officer, Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

7. S.B. Jaglal, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto.

Abstract

Background: Little is known about physical therapists’ experiences using research evidence to improve the delivery of stroke rehabilitation.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore how physical therapists use research evidence to update the clinical management of walking rehabilitation after stroke. Specific objectives were to identify physical therapists’ clinical questions related to walking rehabilitation, sources of information sought to address these questions, and factors influencing the incorporation of research evidence into practice.Design and Methods: Two authors conducted in-depth telephone interviews with 23 physical therapists who treat people with stroke and who had participated in a previous survey on evidence-based practice. Data were analyzed with a constant comparative approach to identify emerging themes.Results: Therapists commonly raised questions about the selection of treatments or outcome measures. Therapists relied foremost on peers for information because of their availability, ease of access, and minimal cost. Participants sought information from research literature themselves or with the help of librarians or students. Research syntheses (eg, systematic reviews) enabled access to a body of research. Older therapists described insufficient computer and search skills. Most participants considered appraisal and application of research findings challenging and identified insufficient time and peer isolation as organizational barriers to the use of research.Conclusions: Physical therapists require efficient access to research syntheses primarily to inform the measurement and treatment of walking limitation after stroke. Continuing education is needed to enhance skills in appraising research findings and applying them to practice. Older therapists require additional training to develop computer and search skills. Peer networks and student internships may optimize the exchange of new knowledge for therapists working in isolation.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3