Direct Access to Physical Therapy in the Netherlands: Results From the First Year in Community-Based Physical Therapy

Author:

Leemrijse Chantal J1,Swinkels Ilse CS2,Veenhof Cindy3

Affiliation:

1. CJ Leemrijse, PT, PhD, is Researcher, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research–Allied Health Care (NIVEL), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

2. ICS Swinkels, MSc, is Researcher, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research–Allied Health Care (NIVEL).

3. C Veenhof, PT, PhD, is Research Coordinator, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research–Allied Health Care (NIVEL).

Abstract

BackgroundIn 2006, direct access to physical therapy was introduced in the Netherlands. Before this policy measure, evaluation and treatment by a physical therapist were only possible following referral by a physician.ObjectiveThe objectives of this study were to investigate how many patients use direct access and to establish whether these patients have a different profile than referred patients.MethodsElectronic health care data from the National Information Service for Allied Health Care (LiPZ), a nationally representative registration network of 93 Dutch physical therapists working in 43 private practices, were used.ResultsIn 2006, 28% of the patients seen by a physical therapist came by direct access. Patients with non–further-specified back problems, patients with nonspecific neck complaints, and higher-educated patients were more likely to refer themselves to a physical therapist, as were patients with health problems lasting for less than 1 month. Younger patients made more use of direct access. In addition, patients with recurring complaints more often referred themselves, as did patients who had received earlier treatment by a physical therapist. Patients with direct access received fewer treatment sessions. Compared with 2005, there was no increase in the number of patients visiting a physical therapist.LimitationsData came only from physical therapists working on general conditions in general practices. Severity of complaints is not reported.ConclusionsA large, specific group of patients utilized self-referral, but the total number of patients seen by a physical therapist remained the same. In the future, it is important to evaluate the consequences of direct access, both on quality aspects and on cost-effectiveness.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference33 articles.

1. The Dutch health insurance law: the accumulation of 30 years of reform thought;Groenewegen;Eur J Public Health,2006

2. Physiotherapists as first-contact practitioners: new challenges and responsibilities in Australia;Galley;Physiotherapy,1977

3. Direct access to physiotherapy in primary care: now? and into the future?;Holdsworth;Physiotherapy,2004

4. 2002 APTA Presidential Address: What's all the fuss about direct access?;Massey;Phys Ther,2002

Cited by 84 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3