Measurement Properties of Instruments for Measuring of Lymphedema: Systematic Review

Author:

Hidding Janine T.1,Viehoff Peter B.2,Beurskens Carien H.G.3,van Laarhoven Hanneke W.M.4,Nijhuis-van der Sanden Maria W.G.5,van der Wees Philip J.6

Affiliation:

1. J.T. Hidding, PT, MSc, Department of Orthopedics, Section of Physical Therapy, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Groteplein Noord 21, Nijmegen 6525 EZ, the Netherlands, and Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

2. P.B. Viehoff, PT, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and Centre for Physical and Manual Therapy 't Gilde, Gorinchem, the Netherlands.

3. C.H.G. Beurskens, PT, PhD, Department of Orthopedics, Section of Physical Therapy, Radboud University Medical Center.

4. H.W.M. van Laarhoven, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

5. M.W.G. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, PT, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare).

6. P.J. van der Wees, PT, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare).

Abstract

Abstract Background Lymphedema is a common complication of cancer treatment, resulting in swelling and subjective symptoms. Reliable and valid measurement of this side effect of medical treatment is important. Purpose The purpose of this study was to provide best evidence regarding which measurement instruments are most appropriate in measuring lymphedema in its different stages. Data Sources The PubMed and Web of Science databases were used, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Study Selection Clinical studies on measurement instruments assessing lymphedema were reviewed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) scoring instrument for quality assessment. Data Extraction Data on reliability, concurrent validity, convergent validity, sensitivity, specificity, applicability, and costs were extracted. Data Synthesis Pooled data showed good intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (.89) for bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) in the lower extremities and high intrarater and interrater ICCs for water volumetry, tape measurement, and perometry (.98–.99) in the upper extremities. In the upper extremities, the standard error of measurement was 3.6% (σ=0.7%) for water volumetry, 5.6% (σ=2.1%) for perometry, and 6.6% (σ=2.6%) for tape measurement. Sensitivity of tape measurement in the upper extremities, using different cutoff points, varied from 0.73 to 0.90, and specificity values varied from 0.72 to 0.78. Limitations No uniform definition of lymphedema was available, and a gold standard as a reference test was lacking. Items concerning risk of bias were study design, patient selection, description of lymphedema, blinding of test outcomes, and number of included participants. Conclusions Measurement instruments with evidence for good reliability and validity were BIS, water volumetry, tape measurement, and perometry, where BIS can detect alterations in extracellular fluid in stage 1 lymphedema and the other measurement instruments can detect alterations in volume starting from stage 2. In research, water volumetry is indicated as a reference test for measuring lymphedema in the upper extremities.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference70 articles.

1. Estimating the population burden of lymphedema;Rockson;Ann NY Acad Sci,2008

2. Coding of meaningful concepts in lymphedema-specific questionnaires with the ICF;Viehoff;Disabil Rehabil,2013

3. Lymphedema beyond breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer-related secondary lymphedema;Cormier;Cancer,2010

4. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2013 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology;International Society of Lymphology;Lymphology,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3