Neck Pain and Proprioception Revisited Using the Proprioception Incongruence Detection Test

Author:

Harvie Daniel S.1,Hillier Susan2,Madden Victoria J.3,Smith Ross T.4,Broecker Markus5,Meulders Ann6,Moseley G. Lorimer7

Affiliation:

1. D.S. Harvie, PhD, MMusc&SportsPhysio, BPhysio(Hons), Sansom Institute for Health Research, The University of South Australia, GPO Box 247, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia, and Menzies Health Institute QLD, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

2. S. Hillier, PhD, Sansom Institute for Health Research, The University of South Australia.

3. V.J. Madden, BSc, Sansom Institute for Health Research, The University of South Australia.

4. R.T. Smith, PhD, The Wearable Computer Lab, The University of South Australia.

5. M. Broecker, PhD, The Living Environments Lab, The University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.

6. A. Meulders, PhD, Department of Psychology, Research Group on Health Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

7. G.L. Moseley, PhD, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, and Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, Australia.

Abstract

Background Proprioceptive imprecision is believed to contribute to persistent pain. Detecting imprecision in order to study or treat it remains challenging given the limitations of current tests. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine whether proprioceptive imprecision could be detected in people with neck pain by testing their ability to identify incongruence between true head motion and a false visual reference using the Proprioception Incongruence Detection (PID) Test. Design A cross-sectional study was conducted. Methods Twenty-four people with neck pain and 24 matched controls repeatedly rotated to specific markers within a virtual world and indicated if their true head rotation was more or less than the rotation suggested by the visual feedback. Visual feedback was manipulated at 6 corrections, ranging from 60% of true movement to 140% of true movement. A standard repositioning error (RPE) test as undertaken for comparison. Results Healthy controls were better able to detect incongruence between vision and true head rotation (X̅=75.6%, SD=8.5%) than people with neck pain were (X̅=69.6%, SD=12.7%). The RPE test scores were not different between groups. The PID Test score related to self-reported pain intensity but did not relate to RPE test score. Limitations Causality cannot be established from this cross-sectional study, and further work refining the PID Test is needed for it to offer clinical utility. Conclusions Proprioceptive precision for neck movement appears worse in people with neck pain than in those without neck pain, and the extent of the deficit appears to be related to usual pain severity. The PID Test appears to be a more sensitive test than the RPE test and is likely to be useful for assessment of proprioceptive function in research and clinical settings.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3