Physical Therapists' Use of Functional Electrical Stimulation for Clients With Stroke: Frequency, Barriers, and Facilitators

Author:

Auchstaetter Nolan1,Luc Juliana2,Lukye Stacey3,Lynd Kaylea4,Schemenauer Shelby5,Whittaker Maura6,Musselman Kristin E.7

Affiliation:

1. N. Auchstaetter, MScPT, School of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

2. J. Luc, MScPT, School of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan.

3. S. Lukye, MScPT, School of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan.

4. K. Lynd, MScPT, School of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan.

5. S. Schemenauer, MScPT, School of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan.

6. M. Whittaker, BScPT, FES Mobility, West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

7. K.E. Musselman, PhD, School of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; SCI Mobility Lab, Lyndhurst Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute–University Health Network, 520 Sutherland Dr, Toronto, Ontario, M4G 3V9 Canada; and Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Abstract Background Best practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation recommend functional electrical stimulation (FES) to improve gait and upper extremity function. Whether these guidelines have been implemented in practice is unknown. Objective The purposes of this study were: (1) to determine the frequency with which physical therapists use FES to address common therapeutic goals poststroke and (2) to identify the barriers to and facilitators of FES use. Design This was a cross-sectional, survey study. Methods A valid and reliable online survey was sent to Canadian physical therapists. Questions about demographic characteristics, FES use, knowledge of FES literature, and barriers and facilitators were posed. Closed-ended questions were analyzed with descriptive statistics and index scoring to produce summary scores. Pearson or point-biserial correlation coefficients correlated FES use with demographic variables. Open-ended questions about barriers and facilitators were analyzed by 3 researchers using a conventional content analysis. Results Two hundred ninety-eight physical therapists responded. Use of FES for clients with stroke was low for all therapeutic goals queried (improve walking, arm function, muscle strength and endurance, and sensation; prevent shoulder subluxation; and decrease spasticity). However, 52.6% of the respondents stated that they would like to increase their use of FES. More than 40% of the respondents were unsure of the strength of the evidence supporting FES for stroke care. Physical therapists with postgraduate FES training were more likely to use FES (r=.471, P<.001). A lack of access to resources, such as time, equipment, and training, was the most frequently cited barrier to FES use. Limitations As an observational study, cause-and-effect relationships for FES use cannot be identified. Conclusions Functional electrical stimulation is not widely used by physical therapists in stroke rehabilitation. Improving access to resources—in particular, continuing education—may facilitate the implementation of FES into clinical practice.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference34 articles.

1. Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery. Intervention. Stroke Engine. Updated July 16, 2012. Available at: http://strokengine.ca/intervention/index.php?page=topic&id=59. Accessed November 19, 2013.

2. Teasell, R, Foley, N, Salter, K, . Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation: executive summary. 2014. Available at: http://www.ebrsr.com. Accessed June 15, 2015.

3. Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials;Glanz;Arch Phys Med Rehabil,1996

4. Paretic upper extremity movement gains are retained 3 months after training with an electrical stimulation neuroprosthesis;Persch;Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3