Abstract
As the impetus for community engagement (CE) grows in higher education, it is imperative that such growth takes place within a sound ethical framework. While research-related ethics and norms are well developed, there is now a need for the development of ethical guidelines to underpin CE initiatives. We begin by framing the discussion of ethics within policy and theoretical frameworks underpinning CE in higher education in South Africa. Core concepts and values emerging from these frameworks, such as social responsibility, Ubuntu and interconnectedness, are important starting points for ethics in CE. As CE involves the exercising of leadership by universities and community partners, we explore key ethical concepts to underpin established frameworks for governance and leadership, such as the King IV report. We highlight core ethical principles such as sustainable development, integrity, and accountability. We further consider that value propositions must not narrowly focus on value to stakeholders, but also to broader systems. The discussion then narrows to the application of ethics to the specifics of CE. We apply the “four principles” of Beauchamp and Childress (non-maleficence, beneficence, justice, and autonomy), considering each of these principles in turn. We discuss their application in practical terms to university CE initiatives. Finally, we consider the way forward in relation to the integration of these ethical imperatives into higher education CE policies and processes. Recommendations include: the inclusion of ethical frameworks in CE policies of universities; the establishment of ethics committees/forums to guide CE; and the need to heighten ethical consciousness among CE practitioners.
Reference41 articles.
1. Adhikari, B., Pell, C. & Cheah, P.Y. (2020). Community engagement and ethical global health research. Global Bioethics, 31(1), p 1-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968663/
2. African Union Agenda. 2063: (2015). The Africa we want. “A shared strategic framework for inclusive growth and sustainable development & a global strategy to optimize the use of Africa’s resources for the benefit of all Africans” September 2015. https://au.int/en/agenda2063/overview
3. Barker, D. (2004). The Scholarship of Engagement: A Taxonomy of Five Emerging Practices. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 9(2), 123–137. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1096763.pdf
4. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.
5. Bennet, C. A.; Anderson, J. & Sice, P. (2015). Reflections on Socratic Dialogue I: the Theoretical Background in a Modern Context. Philosophy of Management, 14 (2015), 159–169 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304243131_Reflections_on_Socratic_Dialogue_I_the_Theoretical_Background_in_a_Modern_Context