Author:
Jaramillo Carlos D.,Rivera Posada Jairo A.,Echavarría Alejandro,O¨byrne Johan,Congote Diego,Restrepo Luis F.
Abstract
Summary
In the following article the effects of two types of hydroxiapatites on bone synthesis and properties were evaluated. One of them (OseoU) was synthesized at two different temperatures to compare it to a commercial mixture of hydroxiapatite (Osteogen®) commonly used in several surgical procedures in which loss of bone tissue is present. The synthesis was carried out in the laboratories of the Universidad de Antioquia by precipitating the mixture of calcium nitrate and ammonium phosphate. The final products and the commercial hydroxiapatite were characterized by sweeper electronic microscopy (SEM), X ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and energy dispersed spectrometry (EDS). The properties of osteoconduction and osteointegration were measured according to the capacity of the products to induce the differentiation of local cells into bone forming cells. Such characteristics were evaluated in hydroxiapatite implants in 70 New Zealand breed rabbits distributed in seven groups, ten rabbits in each group, which were evaluated at days 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 60 and 90 after the surgical procedure. The results demonstrated that the hydroxiapatites synthesized in the laboratories of the Universidad de Antioquia and the commercial hydroxiapatite showed similar characteristics in terms of the crystal structure, chemical composition and absorption properties with slight morphological differences in particle shape and size. Using variance analysis, no meaningful statistical differences were found between the histopathological variables evaluated in the several hydroxiapatite groups (p>0.05), indicating that results obtained with both the OseoU and the commercial hydroxiapatite equally affected bone synthesis and properties.
Reference25 articles.
1. Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Tal H, Dayan D. Histopatological morphometric evaluation of 2 different hydroxyapatite-bone derivates in sinus augmentation procedures: A comparative study in Humans. J Periodontol 2001; 71:911-920.
2. Bay, RA. The pathophysiology and anatomy of edentulous bone loss. En Fonseca R., Davis, W. (eds): Reconstructive Preprosthetic Oral and Maxillofacial surgery. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders. 1985.
3. Block MS, Kent JN. Long term radiographic evaluation of hidroxilapatite augmentation of deficient mandibular alveolar ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 42:793-796.
4. Block, M.S., Kent, J.N., Ardoin, RC., Davenport, W.: Mandibular augmentation in dogs with hidroxilapatite combined with demineralizes bone. J Oral Maxilofac Surg 1987; 45:414-420.
5. Callan DP, Rohrer MD. Use of bovine derivared hydroxyapatite in the treatment of edentulous ridge defects. A human clinical and histopatological case report. J Periodontol 1993; 64:575-582.