Abstract
This paper locates a Relevant Literary Space (RLS) about service quality evaluation, between 2006 and 2011, in order to characterise the following: service typologies, evaluation approaches, measurement models, reliability indexes, scales, quantitative techniques, factors (or quality dimensions) and likely variables affected by them. For this we use a systematic literature review methodology, taking the Scopus database to browse the research papers. The procedure was carried out through the plan-do-check-act cycle. The findings show that the e-service is the most studied typology; the hybrid models are the most used as well as the 7-point Likert scale and Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha (average value of 0.87). Also, the findings show that the majority of the research community applies Structural Equation Modeling. From a holistic interpretation, a general structure of service quality is proposed. This article offers findings about the application of reproducible methods, open-to-scrutiny, and free of inclusion/exclusion biases of studies.
Reference78 articles.
1. J. Cronin, S. Taylor. “Measuring Service Quality: A Re-Examination and Extension”. Journal of Marketing. Vol. 56. 1999. pp. 55-68.
2. A. Parasuraman, V. Zeithaml, L. Berry. “SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality”. Journal of Retailing. Vol. 64. 1988. pp. 12-40.
3. C. Torgerson. Systematic Reviews (Continuum Research Methods). Ed. Continuum International Publishing Group. London, England. 2003. pp. 114. England. ness incluircir el nden ascendente, favor reorganizarlas en la lista.
4. F. Shull, J. Singer, D. Sjoberg. Guide to advance empirical software engineering. 1st ed. Ed. Springer-Verlag. London, England. 2007. pp. 388.
5. J. Pérez. Revisión sistemática de literatura en ingeniería. 1st ed. Ed. Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. 2012. pp. 102.