Inhibited privatization: a hurdle race over vested interests

Author:

Senderski Marcin

Abstract

This paper recognizes vested interests as one of the primary premises that reduce the effectiveness of privatization policy, stall its momentum and produce structural problems in the long-run. Both exogenous and endogenous drawbacks are cited, but the main focus is put on the dynamism of vested interests’ character, interconnectedness and evolution. Policy makers have been long aware of the existence of activities rooted in vested interests including empire building behaviors, creation of sinecures or extravagant management style. Hence, the fundamental effort here is put on the identification of emerging vested interests that were typically not considered by scholars. The channels through which conventional vested interests have snowballed over time are emphasized. This includes casting a closer glance at family employment, as well as at sports sponsorship arrangements, which emerge as the favorite domain of marketing activity for Polish state-owned enterprises. The research of available literature is performed, along with its application to the Polish case, and insightful observations concerning the anatomy of privatization-related reluctance. Rough policy recommendations conclude the paper.

Publisher

Universidade da Coruna

Subject

Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics

Reference91 articles.

1. Agarwal, Jamuna P., Nunnenkamp, Peter. (1992) ‘Methods and Sequencing of Privatization: What Post-socialist Countries Can Learn from Chile’, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel Working Paper No. 527.

2. Alesina, Alberto F., Tabellini, Guido. (2004) ‘Bureaucrats or Politicians?’, Center for Economic Studies & Ifo Institute for Economic Research, Working Paper Series No. 1130.

3. Andreff, Wladimir. (2006) ‘New Perspectives in Sports Economics: A European View’, AIES/IASE, Working Paper Series No. 06-05.

4. Andreff, Wladimir. (2008) ‘Globalization of the Sports Economy’, Rivista di Diritto ed Economia dello Sport 4(3):13-32.

5. Bauer, Johannes M. (2003) ‘The Coexistence of Regulation, State Ownership and Competition in Infrastructure Industries: Quagmire or Institutional Innovation’, Quello Center for Telecommunication Management and Law, Working Paper 003-2003.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3