Public-private partnerships caught in a trust-trap and the potential role of information: the burden of divergent rationales

Author:

Kappler MoritzORCID,Schomaker RahelORCID,Bauer MichaelORCID

Abstract

Trust is known to be beneficial for cooperation, though remains underdeveloped in public-private partnerships (PPPs), which are caught in a trust trap due to the cooperative regime’s internal heterogeneity. Accordingly, PPP’s inherent trust relationship is disentangled, and the burden of divergent actor rationales is introduced. We hypothesize that potential PPPs find themselves ex ante in a situation that requires certain repair mechanisms before the ‘usual’ venues of trust development can become effective. As such, exogenous information is theorized as quasi-substitute for relational experience that may support the development of a ‘leap of faith’. Theoretical considerations are tested by a vignette experiment with representatives of both the public and the private sector. Within and between-group analyses find strong support for the burden of divergent rationales and stable levels of (role-based) trust. However, the effect of the information treatment on trust levels is limited.

Publisher

Universidade da Coruna

Reference85 articles.

1. Anderson, D. M., & Edwards, B. C. (2015). Unfulfilled Promise: Laboratory experiments in public management research. Public Management Review 17(10), pp. 1518-1542.

2. Anderson, E., & Jap, S. D. (2005). MITSLOAN Management Review. Retrieved from The Dark Side of Close

3. Arnold, C., Sapir, E.V., & Zapryanova, G. (2012). Trust in the Institutions of the European Union: A Cross-Country. European Integration Online Papers, 16.

4. Australian Government. (2016). www.infrastructure.gov.au. Retrieved from: https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/infrastructure/ngpd/files/National-PPP-Policy-Framework-Oct-2015.pdf

5. Bachmann, R., Gillespie, N., & Priem, R. (2015). Repairing trust in organizations and institutions: Toward a conceptual framework. Organization Studies, 1123-1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615599334

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3