Author:
Meyer-Sahling Jan-Hinrik,Janta Barbara,Reinholde Iveta,Van Stolk Christian
Abstract
The implementation of austerity measures presents a dilemma for governments. While austerity measures such as cutbacks aim to reduce costs and enhance public sector efficiency, the same measures might undermine the motivation of employees and, consequently, the prospects of effectively implementing austerity programmes. Based on a survey of ministerial officials in Poland and Latvia, this article finds that the scale of cutbacks explains a larger decline of staff motivation in Latvia than in Poland. The article further shows that motivation was more likely to decrease after the crisis if austerity measures involved cutbacks such as staff reductions, recruitment freezes, and a reduction of training opportunities.
Subject
Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics
Reference49 articles.
1. Armingeon, Klaus (2012) ‘The politics of fiscal responses to the crisis of 2008–2009’, Governance, 25(4): 543–565.
2. Bida, A, (2009) ‘Problemy motywacji zatrudnienia w służbie cywilnej (Problems with civil servants job motivation)’ in W Mikułowski and A Jezierska (eds) Wyzwania rozwoju zasobów ludzkich administracji publicznej w dobie kryzysu ekonomicznego (Challenges of public administration human resources development at the time of economic crisis, Conference proceedings, Warszawa (Warsaw), 10-11 December 2009, pp. 109 – 113.
3. Bideleux, Robert (2011) ‘Contrasting responses to the international economic crisis of 2008–10 in the 11 CIS countries and in the 10 post-communist EU member countries’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27(3-4): 338-363.
4. Boyne, George A. (2002) ‘Public and private management: what’s the difference?’, Journal of Management Studie, 39(1): 97–122.
5. Brans, Marleen and B. Guy Peters (eds) (2012) Rewards for High Public Office in Europe and North America. London: Routledge.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献