Author:
Ciriani Stephane,Lebourges Marc
Abstract
The European Union has experienced weak economic performance over the past 15 years, compared to the United States. In order to restore investment, innovation, and therefore growth, the European Commission seeks to raise the level of static competition in all markets. The Commission’s economic policy is largely determined by its competition policy. This policy is derived from its doctrine on competition law, which regards the exercise of market power as a source of inefficiency and advocates that its effects should be banned. By contrast, the United States competition authorities, under the influence of the Chicago School, consider that market power is a necessary incentive to invest and a fair return on investment. Recent findings in economic growth theory, which state that increased competition intensity may harm endogenous innovation, provide a theoretical basis to support the United States approach and call for a review of European doctrine.
Subject
Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics
Reference99 articles.
1. Aghion, Philippe and Rachel Griffith (2005) Competition and Growth. Reconciling Theory and Evidence. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press, 2005.
2. Aghion, Philippe, Nick Bloom, Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith and Peter Howitt (2005) ‘Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(2): 701-728.
3. Askenazy, Philippe, Christophe Cahn and Delphine Irac (2008) ‘Competition, R&D, and the Cost of Innovation’, Banque de France, Notes d’Etudes et de Recherche, NER - R N°197.
4. Barnett, Thomas O. (2007) ‘Issue Statement on European Microsoft Decision’, US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division. Press Release 202-514-2007, September 17th.
5. Belleflamme, Paul and Cecilia Vergari (2010) ‘Incentives to innovate in oligopolies’, The Manchester School 79(1): 6-28.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献