Abstract
In addition to the fact that every science has its subject matter, theory, language and methods, it has to have its unique manner of determining the competence of experts in a certain field. This paper studies the manner of determining the competence of experts when the subject of research belongs to the field of Military Science. To identify the influence of individual elements on the competence of an expert, a model has been formed to define the evaluation of the competence. In order to arrive at a final value of the significance of elements of expert's competence, different subjective methods were used founded on ranking method and Full Consistency Method (FUCOM), Combinative Distance Based Assessment (CODAS), Complex Proportional Assessment (CORPAS), Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) and Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo), as well as the operator Einstein weighted arithmetic average for the aggregation of group decisions. The concurrence of experts was achieved by means of concordance coefficient, while Delphi method was used for the experts surveying process. The proposed model was tested on an illustrative example which proved the validity of the model and the possibility of its application in a real-life situation. This paper should provide assistance to researchers in the field of Military Science who use expert evaluation in their research.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference42 articles.
1. Alkan, N., & Kahraman, C. (2024). CODAS extension using novel decomposed Pythagorean fuzzy sets: Strategy selection for IOT based sustainable supply chain system. Expert Systems with Applications, 237, 121534;
2. Badi, I., Stević, Ž., & Bouraima, M. B. (2023). Overcoming obstacles to renewable energy development in Libya: An MCDM approach towards effective strategy formulation. Decision Making Advances, 1(1), 17-24;
3. Bajrami, Š. (2022). Model upotrebe Rečne flotile u operaciji pomoći civilnim organima vlasti u slučaju poplava. Doktorska disertacija. Vojna akademija Univerziteta odbrane u Beogradu;
4. Beach, B. H. (1975). Expert judgment about uncertainty: Bayesian decision making in realistic settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14(1), 10-59;
5. Benini, A., Chataigner, P., Noumri, N., Parham, N., Sweeney, J., & Tax, L. (2017). The Use of Expert Judgment in Humanitarian Analysis - Theory, Methods, Applications. Geneva: Assessment Capacities Project - ACAPS. Preuzeto: 4. novembra 2023, sa https://reliefweb.int/attachments/05a1180c-b673-3f1c-a51e-cedbf0a08f4b/acaps_expert_ judgment_-_full_study_august_2017.pdf;