The partition of Kosovo and Metohija: Reality or delusion?

Author:

Proroković Dušan

Abstract

Although the topic of dividing Kosovo and Metohija into the Serbian and Albanian part was mostly avoided by officials, both national and international, it has been discussed in public since the 1960s, mostly owing to Dobrica Ćosić. By choosing the concept of "demarcation" as "the final solution" during the negotiations between Belgrade and Priština from 2018, the thinking about partition has been reaffirmed. At one point, the highest officials of the Republic of Serbia have announced that the idea represents an official position. However, there are four problems with this approach. Firstly, this concept has never been concretized at the official level. The proposals by Branislav Krstić and Dušan Bataković were probably considered, but not adopted as a part of the Serbian state strategy. Secondly, there was no preparation of the public for such an outcome or that work was sloppily done at the moment when the proposal, at least in principle, was declared official. Hence, the "shallow support" was relative, which is why the legitimacy of the idea was questioned. Thirdly, there are no serious indications that the Albanian party is interested in such an outcome. The attitude of politicians, their readiness to discuss this topic is not well accepted by the Albanian public, thus such a course of action is disputed. Even if a consensus was reached in the negotiations and some kind of agreement was signed with such content, it would remain open how long-term it would be and what consequences there would be in the future. The indications that demarcation can be considered are conditioned in such a way that it would actually represent essential delimitation, exchange of territories, with the accompanying request to continue the process of enlarging the Albanian ethno space. Fourthly, there is no agreement of international factors to carry out something like that. Also, when certain proposals were finally considered and "leaked to the public", they were in line with what the Albanian party was asking for and largely respected the Albanian interests. In the current format of negotiations, and in accordance with the position of the key Western countries responsible for the current situation in Kosovo and Metohija, the implementation of the concept of demarcation cannot have positive effects for Serbia, viewed from a short or long-term perspective whatsoever. The path to the partition of Kosovo and Metohija, just when such a concept would be accepted by international actors as a solution, is full of uncertainty and ambiguity. It is difficult to report such an idea without many consequences after its execution. If partition is to be considered as a solution, long and thorough preparation is necessary, taking into account all its aspects including the new territorial reconfiguration of the postYugoslav space, the implications for regional relations, security and stability.

Funder

Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference31 articles.

1. Adelheid Wölfl, "Grenzwertige Debatte um den Kosovo", Frankfurter Rundschau, 19.02.2019, https://www.fr.de/politik/grenzwertige-debatte-kosovo-11781055.html, 29/10/2021;

2. Agim Hyseni, "Fehmi Agani për çështjen e ndarjes: Kosova është një dhe e pandashme", 10.12.2018, https//agimhyseni.com/2018/12/10/fehmi-agani-per-ndarjen-ekosoves-kosova-eshte-nje-dhe-e-pandashme/, 08/11/2021;

3. Andrew Gray, " Angela Merkel: No Balkan border changes", Politico, 13.08.2018, https://www.politico.eu/article/angela-merkel-no-balkan-border-changes-kosovo-serbiavucic-thaci/, 31/10/2021;

4. Branislav Krstić, Kosovo između istorijskog i etničkog prava, Kuća Vid, Beograd, 1994;

5. Branka Trivić, Amra Zejneli Loxha, "I Srbija i Kosovo podeljeni oko razgraničenja", Radio Slobodna Evropa, 22. februar 2019, https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/kosovosrbija-podele-razgranicenje/29784840.html, 23/10/2021;

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3