Abstract
Starting from the exceptional importance of civil society for political/democratic theory, the paper critically analyzes its position in various theoretical discourses, trying to detect the most current changes in its understanding. Along these lines, the paper examines the premodern, modern and postmodern paradigms of civil society. The most important findings are that its interpretation must include: (1) cultural procedurality and diversity against the abstract and repressive given of the Western matrix; (2) the fact that externally controlled non-genuine non-governmental organizations of neoliberal civil society have weak support from citizens and a low level of responsibility; (3) dialogue with neo-traditional associations; and (4) the idea that civil society cannot be freed in a utopian manner from the redistribution of power, which implies its politicization, hierarchization and civil society elites.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference44 articles.
1. Allen, Ch. (1997). Who Needs Civil Society? Review of African Political Economy, 24 (73), 329-337. doi.org/10.1080/03056249708704266;
2. Brusseau, J. (2020). Deleuze's Postscript on the Societies of Control: Updated for Big Data and Predictive Analytics. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 67 (164), 1-25;
3. Chatterjee, P. (2001). On civil and political society in post-colonial democracies. In: Civil Society: History and Possibilities (eds. Sudipta Kaviraj and Sunil Khilnani), 165-179, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
4. Cohen, J., Arato, A. (1997). Civil Society and Political Theory . Cambridge: MIT;
5. Chambers, S., Kopstein, J. (2006). Civil Society and the State. In: The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory by John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig and Anne Phillips (eds.), 363-382, Oxford: Oxford University Press;