Disciplinary self-reflection in Serbian sociology: Findings of an in-depth interview

Author:

Vuković AnaORCID

Abstract

This paper is based on the data from the author's interviews with our sociologists of different generations and places of employment. In the qualitative research, the following questions, among others, were analyzed: 1. whether sociology is in crisis; 2. theoretical and methodological pluralism in sociology; 3. the sociologist's potential (sociological approach, sociologist's imagination) to investigate the problems of contemporary society. Based on the analysis of the answers, the following items were considered: 1. the social position of sociology as a scientific and research discipline; 2. the potential and applicability of sociological knowledge to the problems faced by the sociological profession itself. The author concludes that, according to our sociologists, sociology in Serbia cannot boast of any particular epistemological successes in the field of researching global structures and understanding the world-historical processes in which Serbian society finds itself, but that its potential for research is considerable and that, as a first step, it is necessary for sociology to return to the study of social structure, i.e., society in totality, as its main epistemological task.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference28 articles.

1. Antonić S. (2021). Some Reflections on the 60th anniversary of the Continuation of the Sociološki pregled / Sociological Review (1961-2021). Sociološki pregled 55 (4), 1464-1487. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg55-34682;

2. Antonić S. (2022). Compradors as part of TCC: The case of Serbia. Sociološki pregled, 56 (4), 1169-1191. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg56-41448;

3. Bogdanović, M. (2009). Foreword: Five Decades of Sociology in Serbia. In: M. Bogdanović (ed.), Sociology in Serbia 1959-2009: Institutional Development (7-31). Beograd: Službeni glasnik, Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. [In Serbian];

4. Bogdanović, M. (ed.) (1990). Sociology in Yugoslavia: institutional development. Beograd: Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu. [In Serbian];

5. Bogdanović, M. (1977). Sociologist in practice: scientist or technician?. Sociologija 19 (4), 641-655;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3